Document the role of the maintainer
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca440758be
commit
a1e267dc75
1 changed files with 53 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -4,31 +4,25 @@
|
|||
|
||||
There are a few rules to get your merge request accepted:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Your merge request should only be **merged by a [maintainer][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes only backend changes [^1], it must be
|
||||
1. Your merge request can only be **merged by a [maintainer][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes backend changes [^1], it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [backend maintainer][projects]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes only frontend changes [^1], it must be
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes frontend changes [^1], it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [frontend maintainer][projects]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes UX changes [^1], it must
|
||||
be **approved by a [UX team member][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes UX changes [^1], it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [UX team member][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes adding a new JavaScript library [^1], it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [frontend lead][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes adding a new UI/UX paradigm [^1], it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [UX lead][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes frontend and backend changes [^1], it must
|
||||
be **approved by a [frontend and a backend maintainer][projects]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes UX and frontend changes [^1], it must
|
||||
be **approved by a [UX team member and a frontend maintainer][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes UX, frontend and backend changes [^1], it must
|
||||
be **approved by a [UX team member, a frontend and a backend maintainer][team]**.
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes a new dependency or a filesystem change, it must
|
||||
be *approved by a [Distribution team member][team]*. See how to work with the [Distribution team for more details.](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/dev-backend/distribution/)
|
||||
1. To lower the amount of merge requests maintainers need to review, you can
|
||||
1. If your merge request includes a new dependency or a filesystem change, it must be
|
||||
**approved by a [Distribution team member][team]**. See how to work with the [Distribution team](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/dev-backend/distribution/) for more details.
|
||||
1. If more than one of the items above apply to your merge request, it must be
|
||||
**approved by all listed people**. The last of the people to approve can then merge it.
|
||||
1. To lower the amount of merge requests maintainers need to review, you are encouraged
|
||||
ask or assign any [reviewers][projects] for a first review.
|
||||
1. If you need some guidance (e.g. it's your first merge request), feel free
|
||||
to ask one of the [Merge request coaches][team].
|
||||
1. It is recommended that you assign a maintainer that is from a different team than your own.
|
||||
This ensures that all code across GitLab is consistent and can be easily understood by all contributors.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Keep in mind that maintainers are also going to perform a final code review.
|
||||
The ideal scenario is that the reviewer has already addressed any concerns
|
||||
|
@ -37,6 +31,49 @@ There are a few rules to get your merge request accepted:
|
|||
|
||||
For more guidance, see [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
|
||||
|
||||
### The role of the maintainer
|
||||
|
||||
Maintainers are responsible for the overall health, quality, and consistency of
|
||||
the GitLab codebase, across domains and product areas. Consequently, their reviews
|
||||
will focus primarily on things like overall architecture, code organization,
|
||||
separation of concerns, tests, DRYness, consistency, readability, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Their job is explicitly _not_ to review the solution itself. By the time a merge
|
||||
request makes it to a maintainer, they should be able to assume that it actually
|
||||
solves the problem it was meant to solve, that it does so in the most appropriate
|
||||
way, that it satisfies all requirements, and that there are no remaining bugs,
|
||||
logical problems, or uncovered edge cases.
|
||||
|
||||
The responsibility to find the best solution and implement it lies with the
|
||||
merge request author, and they should be confident of the chosen solution,
|
||||
implementation, and everything else that makes up the merge request, before
|
||||
they ask a maintainer for final review, approval, and merge.
|
||||
|
||||
To reach this level of confidence, an author is expected to involve other people
|
||||
in the investigation and implementation processes as appropriate. They may want
|
||||
to reach out to domain experts to discuss different solutions or get an
|
||||
implementation reviewed, to product managers and UX designers to clear up
|
||||
confusion or verify that the end result matches what they had in mind, or to
|
||||
database specialists to get input on the data model or specific queries.
|
||||
|
||||
They are also strongly encouraged to get their code reviewed by any other developer
|
||||
as soon as there is any code to review, to get a second opinion on the chosen
|
||||
solution and implementation and an extra pair of eyes looking for bugs,
|
||||
logic problems, or uncovered edge cases, and to ease the job of the maintainer.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, a maintainer will also make note of any issues with the solution or
|
||||
implementation they may find, but in general will assume that the author is the
|
||||
expert on the issue at hand, and that they made their choices with good reason.
|
||||
|
||||
Since a maintainer's job does not depend on their domain-specific knowledge beyond
|
||||
knowledge of the overall GitLab codebase, they can review merge requests from any
|
||||
team and in any product area.
|
||||
|
||||
Authors are recommended to assign merge requests to maintainers from other teams
|
||||
than their own, to ensure that all code across GitLab is consistent and can be
|
||||
easily understood by all contributors, from both inside and outside the company,
|
||||
without requiring team-specific expertise.
|
||||
|
||||
## Best practices
|
||||
|
||||
This guide contains advice and best practices for performing code review, and
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue