kotovalexarian-likes-gitlab/gitlab-org--gitlab-foss

Fork 0

Commit graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jan Provaznik	0fc9f9d3e7	Add version 4.2 to all existing migrations DB schema generated by a migration may look different in rails 4 and 5 (because rails 5 may use different default values). For this reason it's important to explicitly set for which rails version a migration was written for. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35929869/activerecordmigration-deprecation-warning-asks-for-rails-version-but-im-no/35930912#35930912	2018-11-22 13:18:28 +01:00
Yorick Peterse	d0b8f536a1	Remove soft removals related code This removes all usage of soft removals except for the "pending delete" system implemented for projects. This in turn simplifies all the query plans of the models that used soft removals. Since we don't really use soft removals for anything useful there's no point in keeping it around. This _does_ mean that hard removals of issues (which only admins can do if I'm not mistaken) can influence the "iid" values, but that code is broken to begin with. More on this (and how to fix it) can be found in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/31114. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/37447	2018-01-08 17:04:45 +01:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Jan Provaznik

0fc9f9d3e7

Add version 4.2 to all existing migrations

DB schema generated by a migration may look different in
rails 4 and 5 (because rails 5 may use different default values).
For this reason it's important to explicitly set for which rails
version a migration was written for.

See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35929869/activerecordmigration-deprecation-warning-asks-for-rails-version-but-im-no/35930912#35930912

2018-11-22 13:18:28 +01:00

Yorick Peterse

d0b8f536a1

Remove soft removals related code

This removes all usage of soft removals except for the "pending delete"
system implemented for projects. This in turn simplifies all the query
plans of the models that used soft removals. Since we don't really use
soft removals for anything useful there's no point in keeping it around.

This _does_ mean that hard removals of issues (which only admins can do
if I'm not mistaken) can influence the "iid" values, but that code is
broken to begin with. More on this (and how to fix it) can be found in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/31114.

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/37447

2018-01-08 17:04:45 +01:00

2 commits