This removes the need for relying on Rails' "dependent" option for data
removal, which is _incredibly_ slow (even when using :delete_all) when
deleting large amounts of data. This also ensures data consistency is
enforced on DB level and not on application level (something Rails is
really bad at).
This commit also includes various migrations to add foreign keys to
tables that eventually point to "projects" to ensure no rows get
orphaned upon removing a project.
I don't know why this happens exactly, but given an upstream and fork repository
from a customer, both of which required GC, resolving conflicts would corrupt
the fork so badly that it couldn't be cloned.
This isn't a perfect fix for that case, because the MR may still need to be
merged manually, but it does ensure that the repository is at least usable.
My best guess is that when we generate the index for the conflict
resolution (which we previously did in the target project), we obtain a
reference to an OID that doesn't exist in the source, even though we already
fetch the refs from the target into the source.
Explicitly setting the source project as the place to get the merge index from
seems to prevent repository corruption in this way.
Not only tracking auto-cancelling in pipelines,
we'll also track this in jobs because pipelines
could be retried and the information would get lost
when this happened. Also erase auto-cancelling
relation for pipelines when they're retried.
Added specs for the deploy_keys_presenter and added a new method in the presenter
called #key_available?
Fixed some minor UX inconsistencies and added a concern to handle
redirection
Yorick Peterse