* Added keyword arguments to truncated_diff_lines method to allow for using highlighting or not (html templates vs. text)
* Tweaked templates for consistency and format appropriateness
Previously the `truncated_diff_lines` method for outputting a discussion diff took in already highlighted lines, which meant it wasn't reuseable for truncating ANY lines. In the way it was used, it also meant that for any email truncation, the whole diff was being highlighted before being truncated, meaning wasted time highlighting lines that wouldn't even be used (granted, they were being memoized, so perhaps this wasn't that great of an issue). I refactored truncation away from highlighting, in order to truncate formatted diffs for text templates in email, using `>`s to designate each line, but otherwise retaining the parsing already done to create `diff_lines`.
Additionally, while notes on merge requests or commits had already been tested, there was no existing test for notes on a diff on an MR or commit. Added mailer tests for such, and a unit test for truncating diff lines.
Currently comments on commits and merge requests do not require merge request- or commit-specific information, but can use the same template. Rather than change the method which calls the template, I opted to keep the templates separate and create a new template to highlight their identicality, while preserving the option to distinguish them from each other in the future.
Also removed some of the inconsistencies between text and html email versions.
Still needed is a text-only version of git diffs and testing.
Added diff hunks to notification emails of messages on merge requests. This
provides code context to the note. Uses existing template for formatting
a diff for email (from repository push notifications).
Emphasize the meaningful informations, and remove the less needed ones:
* Use "!" to identify a merge request
* Write the name of the commented file for diff notes
* Don't show the assignee in the "merged merge request" email
* Less margin: the content appears as the text of the message.
* Streamlined footer: everything on one line, with a small separator.
* Zimbra (www.zimbra.com) chokes on HTML tables, and doesn't display
the content of the message. Switching to a simpler layout fixes the
issue.
Every email has a different way of showing a link to the discussion on
the website. We don't need this anymore, as we now have a standard
"View in GitLab" link in the footer of every email.
The good:
- You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
- Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
- Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
- Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
The questionable:
- Events only know about target projects
- Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
- All operations performed in the satellite
The bad:
- Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
(for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
Fixes:
Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
-Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
-project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
-fixed remote removal
-How to merge renders properly
-Update emails to show project/branches
-Edit MR doesn't set target branch
-Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
-Added back a test around merge request observer
-Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
-Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
-Signifant speed ups for tests
-Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
-Remove wiki schema update
Fixes for search/search results
-Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
-updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
-udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
hhoopes