Fix missing Note access checks in by moving Note#search to updated NoteFinder
Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867
## Which fixes are in this MR?
⚠️ - Potentially untested
💣 - No test coverage
🚥 - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised)
🚦 - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used)
✅ - Permissions check tested
### Note lookup without access check
- [x] ✅ app/finders/notes_finder.rb:13 :download_code check
- [x] ✅ app/finders/notes_finder.rb:19 `SnippetsFinder`
- [x] ✅ app/models/note.rb:121 [`Issue#visible_to_user`]
- [x] ✅ lib/gitlab/project_search_results.rb:113
- This is the only use of `app/models/note.rb:121` above, but importantly has no access checks at all. This means it leaks MR comments and snippets when those features are `team-only` in addition to the issue comments which would be fixed by `app/models/note.rb:121`.
- It is only called from SearchController where `can?(current_user, :download_code, @project)` is checked, so commit comments are not leaked.
### Previous discussions
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b915c5267a63628b0bafd23d37792ae73ceae272_13_13 `: download_code` check on commit
- [x] https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#b915c5267a63628b0bafd23d37792ae73ceae272_19_19 `SnippetsFinder` should be used
- `SnippetsFinder` should check if the snippets feature is enabled -> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/25223
### Acceptance criteria met?
- [x] Tests added for new code
- [x] TODO comments removed
- [x] Squashed and removed skipped tests
- [x] Changelog entry
- [ ] State Gitlab versions affected and issue severity in description
- [ ] Create technical debt issue for NotesFinder.
- Either split into `NotesFinder::ForTarget` and `NotesFinder::Search` or consider object per notable type such as `NotesFinder::OnIssue`. For the first option could create `NotesFinder::Base` which is either inherited from or which can be included in the other two.
- Avoid case statement anti-pattern in this finder with use of `NotesFinder::OnCommit` etc. Consider something on the finder for this? `Model.finder(user, project)`
- Move `inc_author` to the controller, and implement `related_notes` to replace `non_diff_notes`/`mr_and_commit_notes`
See merge request !2035
Previously this class would be given a project ID which was then used to
retrieve the corresponding Project object. However, in all cases the
Project object was already known as it was used to grab the ID to pass
to ProjectSearchResults. By just passing a Project instead we remove the
need for an extra query as well as the need for some other complexity
in this class.
Include the log messages of recent commits in project-level search
results, providing functionality similar to 'git log --grep'.
Update repository model rspec tests to validate the output of
Repository#commits_with_log_matching.
There is no need to check if `repository_ref` is present as:
```
@repository_ref = if repository_ref.present?
repository_ref
else
nil
end
```
is as same as doing:
```
@repository_ref = repository_ref
```
Gitlab::SearchResults and Gitlab::ProjectSearchResults are libraries we
are going to use to get search results based on query, enitity type and
pagination.
It will allow us to get only issues from project #23 where title or
description includes 'foo'.
Ex:
search_results = Gitlab::ProjectSearchResults.new(project.id, 'foo', 'issues')
search_results.objects => # [<Issues #23>, <Issues #34>]
search_results.issues_count => 2
search_results.total_count => 12 (it includes results from comments and
merge requests too)
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
