Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Douwe Maan bef1aca883 Merge branch '28695-move-all-associated-records-to-ghost-user' into 'master'
Resolve "Deleting a user shouldn't delete associated records"

Closes #28695 and #30514

See merge request !10467
2017-04-06 18:54:57 +00:00
Timothy Andrew 1c42505b02
Implement review comments from @DouweM for !10467.
1. Have `MigrateToGhostUser` be a service rather than a mixed-in module, to keep
   things explicit. Specs testing the behavior of this class are moved into a
   separate service spec file.

2. Add a `user.reported_abuse_reports` association to make the
   `migrate_abuse_reports` method more consistent with the other `migrate_`
   methods.
2017-04-06 22:39:40 +05:30
Timothy Andrew 3e1a1242c6
Move a user's award emoji to the ghost user
... when the user is destroyed.

1. Normally, for a given awardable and award emoji name, a user is only allowed
   to create a single award emoji.

2. This validation needs to be removed for ghost users, since:

   - User A and User B have created award emoji - with the same name and against
     the same awardable
   - User A is deleted. Their award emoji is moved to the ghost user
   - User B is deleted. Their award emoji needs to be moved to the ghost user.
     However, this breaks the uniqueness validation, since the ghost user is
     only allowed to have one award emoji of a given name for a given awardable
2017-04-06 18:59:17 +05:30
Timothy Andrew 682987547a
Move a user's abuse reports to the ghost user
... when the user is destroyed.

To clarify, this regards abuse reports that the to-be-deleted user has _reported_.
2017-04-06 18:59:16 +05:30
Timothy Andrew 97cbf7c223
Move a user's notes to the ghost user
... when the user is destroyed.
2017-04-06 18:58:59 +05:30
Timothy Andrew 72580f07af
Move a user's merge requests to the ghost user.
1. When the user is deleted.

2. Refactor out code relating to "migrating records to the ghost user" into a
   `MigrateToGhostUser` concern, which is tested using a shared example.
2017-04-06 18:58:57 +05:30
DJ Mountney a766f60a0b Inlude the password_automatically_check param as permitted config in the user create_service
This param is passed to service in two places, one is in the build_user for non ldap oauth users. And the other is in the initial production admin user seed data.

Without this change, when setting up GitLab in a production environment, you were not being given the option of setting the root password on initial setup in the UI.
2017-04-04 10:18:56 -07:00
Stan Hu 8a71d40e60 Fix race condition where a namespace would be deleted before a project was deleted
When deleting a user, the following sequence could happen:

1. Project `mygroup/myproject` is scheduled for deletion
2. The group `mygroup` is deleted
3. Sidekiq worker runs to delete `mygroup/myproject`, but the namespace and routes have
   been destroyed.

Closes #30334
2017-04-02 05:37:04 -07:00
Rémy Coutable 53ef1de4fc
Fix production admin fixture to use the new `Users::CreateService`
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
2017-03-30 10:41:45 +02:00
Robert Speicher ca9a79f620 Use `:empty_project` where possible in service specs 2017-03-27 20:44:09 -04:00
George Andrinopoulos 7c74a0209b Implement new service for creating user 2017-03-27 09:37:24 +00:00
Douwe Maan 05f331f3ce
Fix access to projects shared with a nested group
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
2017-02-28 14:18:20 +02:00
Timothy Andrew f2ed82fa84
Implement final review comments from @DouweM and @rymai
- Have `Uniquify` take a block instead of a Proc/function. This is more
  idiomatic than passing around a function in Ruby.

- Block a user before moving their issues to the ghost user. This avoids a data
  race where an issue is created after the issues are migrated to the ghost user,
  and before the destroy takes place.

- No need to migrate issues (to the ghost user) in a transaction, because
  we're using `update_all`

- Other minor changes
2017-02-24 16:50:20 +05:30
Timothy Andrew ff19bbd3b4
Deleting a user shouldn't delete associated issues.
- "Associated" issues are issues the user has created + issues that the
  user is assigned to.

- Issues that a user owns are transferred to a "Ghost User" (just a
  regular user with `state = 'ghost'` that is created when
  `User.ghost` is called).

- Issues that a user is assigned to are moved to the "Unassigned" state.

- Fix a spec failure in `profile_spec` — a spec was asserting that when a user
  is deleted, `User.count` decreases by 1. After this change, deleting a user
  creates (potentially) a ghost user, causing `User.count` not to change. The
  spec has been updated to look for the relevant user in the assertion.
2017-02-24 16:50:19 +05:30
Stan Hu e23c803769
Add user deletion permission check in `Users::DestroyService`
We saw from a recent incident that the `Users::DestroyService` would
attempt to delete a user over and over. Revoking the permissions
from the current user did not help. We should ensure that the
current user does, in fact, have permissions to delete the user.

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
2017-02-20 17:19:11 +01:00
dixpac 0dacf3c169 Fix inconsistent naming for services that delete things
* Changed name of delete_user_service and worker to destroy
* Move and change delete_group_service to Groups::DestroyService
* Rename Notes::DeleteService to Notes::DestroyService
2017-02-08 09:16:43 +01:00
Yorick Peterse 6f88984b0d
Synchronize all project authorization refreshing
Previously a lease would only be obtained to update data. This could
lead to duplicate data being inserted, triggering a UNIQUE constraint
error. To work around this we now acquire a lease before performing
_any_ project authorization work, releasing it at the very end.

Fixes #25987
2017-01-16 16:37:48 -05:00
Yorick Peterse de321fbbb5
Remove the project_authorizations.id column
This column used to be a 32 bits integer, allowing for only a maximum of
2 147 483 647 rows. Given enough users one can hit this limit pretty
quickly, as was the case for GitLab.com.

Changing this type to bigint (= 64 bits) would give us more space, but
we'd eventually hit the same limit given enough users and projects. A
much more sustainable solution is to simply drop the "id" column.

There were only 2 lines of code depending on this column being present,
and neither truly required it to be present. Instead the code now uses
the "project_id" column combined with the "user_id" column. This means
that instead of something like this:

    DELETE FROM project_authorizations
    WHERE user_id = X
    AND id = Y;

We now run the following when removing rows:

    DELETE FROM project_authorizations
    WHERE user_id = X
    AND project_id = Y;

Since both user_id and project_id are indexed this should not slow down
the DELETE query.

This commit also removes the "dependent: destroy" clause from the
"project_authorizations" relation in the User and Project models.
Keeping this prevents Rails from being able to remove data as it relies
on an "id" column being present. Since the "project_authorizations"
table has proper foreign keys set up (with cascading removals) we don't
need to depend on any Rails logic.
2017-01-08 13:56:50 +01:00
Adam Niedzielski f0ba001877 Cache project authorizations even when user has access to zero projects 2016-12-28 14:41:30 +01:00
Yorick Peterse f73193c328
Smarter refreshing of authorized projects
Prior to this commit the refreshing of authorized projects was done in
two steps:

1. Remove existing authorizations
2. Insert a new list of all authorizations

This can lead to a high amount of dead tuples as every time all rows are
being replaced. For example, if a user with 100 authorizations is given
access to a new project this would lead to:

* 100 rows being removed
* 101 new rows being inserted

This commit changes the way this system works so it only removes/inserts
what is necessary. Using the above example this would lead to only 1 new
row being inserted, with the initial 100 being left untouched.

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/25257
2016-12-19 17:11:03 +01:00