Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jacob Vosmaer
a02e22438d Fix wrong use of ActiveRecord in PoolRepository 2019-04-20 13:27:53 +00:00
Zeger-Jan van de Weg
752e9c18a1
Leave object pools when destroying projects
This action doesn't lean on reduplication, so a short call can me made
to the Gitaly server to have the object pool remove its remote to the
project pending deletion.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/blob/f6cd55357/internal/git/objectpool/link.go#L58

When an object pool doesn't have members, this would invalidate the need
for a pool. So when a project leaves the pool, the pool will be
destroyed on the background.

Fixes: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/1415
2018-12-19 13:21:56 +01:00
Zeger-Jan van de Weg
896c0bdbfb
Allow public forks to be deduplicated
When a project is forked, the new repository used to be a deep copy of everything
stored on disk by leveraging `git clone`. This works well, and makes isolation
between repository easy. However, the clone is at the start 100% the same as the
origin repository. And in the case of the objects in the object directory, this
is almost always going to be a lot of duplication.

Object Pools are a way to create a third repository that essentially only exists
for its 'objects' subdirectory. This third repository's object directory will be
set as alternate location for objects. This means that in the case an object is
missing in the local repository, git will look in another location. This other
location is the object pool repository.

When Git performs garbage collection, it's smart enough to check the
alternate location. When objects are duplicated, it will allow git to
throw one copy away. This copy is on the local repository, where to pool
remains as is.

These pools have an origin location, which for now will always be a
repository that itself is not a fork. When the root of a fork network is
forked by a user, the fork still clones the full repository. Async, the
pool repository will be created.

Either one of these processes can be done earlier than the other. To
handle this race condition, the Join ObjectPool operation is
idempotent. Given its idempotent, we can schedule it twice, with the
same effect.

To accommodate the holding of state two migrations have been added.
1. Added a state column to the pool_repositories column. This column is
managed by the state machine, allowing for hooks on transitions.
2. pool_repositories now has a source_project_id. This column in
convenient to have for multiple reasons: it has a unique index allowing
the database to handle race conditions when creating a new record. Also,
it's nice to know who the host is. As that's a short link to the fork
networks root.

Object pools are only available for public project, which use hashed
storage and when forking from the root of the fork network. (That is,
the project being forked from itself isn't a fork)

In this commit message I use both ObjectPool and Pool repositories,
which are alike, but different from each other. ObjectPool refers to
whatever is on the disk stored and managed by Gitaly. PoolRepository is
the record in the database.
2018-12-07 19:18:37 +01:00
Zeger-Jan van de Weg
fff7754186
Rename the Repository table to PoolRepository
To separate the different kinds of repositories we have at GitLab this
table will be renamed to pool_repositories. A project can, for now at
least, be member of none, or one of these. The table will get additional
columns in a later merge request where more logic is implemented for the
model.

Further included is a small refactor of logic around hashing ids for the
disk_path, mainly to ensure a previous implementation is reusable.

The disk_path for the pool_repositories table no longer has a NOT NULL
constraint, but given the hashing of the ID requires the DB to assign
the record an ID, an after_create hook is used to update the value.

A related MR is:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/23143, adding
tables for 'normal' repositories and wiki_repositories.
2018-11-27 13:41:46 +01:00