9.7 KiB
| stage | group | comments | description |
|---|---|---|---|
| none | unassigned | false | Improve scalability of GitLab CI/CD |
CI/CD Scaling
Summary
GitLab CI/CD is one of the most data and compute intensive components of GitLab. Since its initial release in November 2012, the CI/CD subsystem has evolved significantly. It was integrated into GitLab in September 2015 and has become one of the most beloved CI/CD solutions.
GitLab CI/CD has come a long way since the initial release, but the design of
the data storage for pipeline builds remains almost the same since 2012. We
store all the builds in PostgreSQL in ci_builds table, and because we are
creating more than 2 million builds each day on GitLab.com,
we are reaching database limits that are slowing our development velocity down.
On February 1st, 2021, GitLab.com surpassed 1 billion CI/CD builds created and the number of builds continues to grow exponentially.
Goals
Enable future growth by making processing 20M builds in a day possible.
Challenges
The current state of CI/CD product architecture needs to be updated if we want to sustain future growth.
We are running out of the capacity to store primary keys
The primary key in ci_builds table is an integer generated in a sequence.
Historically, Rails used to use integer
type when creating primary keys for a table. We did use the default when we
created the ci_builds table in 2012.
The behavior of Rails has changed
since the release of Rails 5. The framework is now using bigint type that is 8
bytes long, however we have not migrated primary keys for ci_builds table to
bigint yet.
We will run out of the capacity of the integer type to store primary keys in
ci_builds table before December 2021. When it happens without a viable
workaround or an emergency plan, GitLab.com will go down.
ci_builds is just one of the tables that are running out of the primary keys
available in Int4 sequence. There are multiple other tables storing CI/CD data
that have the same problem.
Primary keys problem will be tackled by our Database Team.
Status: As of October 2021 the primary keys in CI tables have been migrated to big integers.
The table is too large
There is more than a billion rows in ci_builds table. We store more than 2
terabytes of data in that table, and the total size of indexes is more than 1
terabyte (as of February 2021).
This amount of data contributes to a significant performance problems we experience on our primary PostgreSQL database.
Most of the problem are related to how PostgreSQL database works internally,
and how it is making use of resources on a node the database runs on. We are at
the limits of vertical scaling of the primary database nodes and we frequently
see a negative impact of the ci_builds table on the overall performance,
stability, scalability and predictability of the database GitLab.com depends
on.
The size of the table also hinders development velocity because queries that seem fine in the development environment may not work on GitLab.com. The difference in the dataset size between the environments makes it difficult to predict the performance of even the most simple queries.
Team members and the wider community members are struggling to contribute the
Verify area, because we restricted the possibility of extending ci_builds
even further. Our static analysis tools prevent adding more columns to this
table. Adding new queries is unpredictable because of the size of the dataset
and the amount of queries executed using the table. This significantly hinders
the development velocity and contributes to incidents on the production
environment.
We also expect a significant, exponential growth in the upcoming years.
One of the forecasts done using Facebook's Prophet shows that in the first half of 2024 we expect seeing 20M builds created on GitLab.com each day. In comparison to around 2M we see created today, this is 10x growth our product might need to sustain in upcoming years.
Status: As of October 2021 we reduced the growth rate of ci_builds table
by writing build options and variables to ci_builds_metadata table. We plan
to ship further improvements that will be described in a separate blueprint.
Queuing mechanisms are using the large table
Because of how large the table is, mechanisms that we use to build queues of
pending builds (there is more than one queue), are not very efficient. Pending
builds represent a small fraction of what we store in the ci_builds table,
yet we need to find them in this big dataset to determine an order in which we
want to process them.
This mechanism is very inefficient, and it has been causing problems on the production environment frequently. This usually results in a significant drop of the CI/CD Apdex score, and sometimes even causes a significant performance degradation in the production environment.
There are multiple other strategies that can improve performance and reliability. We can use Redis queuing, or a separate table that will accelerate SQL queries used to build queues and we want to explore them.
Status: As of October 2021 the new architecture has been implemented on GitLab.com. The following epic tracks making it generally available: Make the new pending builds architecture generally available.
Moving big amounts of data is challenging
We store a significant amount of data in ci_builds table. Some of the columns
in that table store a serialized user-provided data. Column ci_builds.options
stores more than 600 gigabytes of data, and ci_builds.yaml_variables more
than 300 gigabytes (as of February 2021).
It is a lot of data that needs to be reliably moved to a different place. Unfortunately, right now, our background migrations are not reliable enough to migrate this amount of data at scale. We need to build mechanisms that will give us confidence in moving this data between columns, tables, partitions or database shards.
Effort to improve background migrations will be owned by our Database Team.
Status: In progress. We plan to ship further improvements that will be described in a separate architectural blueprint.
Proposal
Making GitLab CI/CD product ready for the scale we expect to see in the upcoming years is a multi-phase effort.
First, we want to focus on things that are urgently needed right now. We need to fix primary keys overflow risk and unblock other teams that are working on database partitioning and sharding.
We want to improve known bottlenecks, like builds queuing mechanisms that is using the large table, and other things that are holding other teams back.
Extending CI/CD metrics is important to get a better sense of how the system performs and to what growth should we expect. This will make it easier for us to identify bottlenecks and perform more advanced capacity planning.
Next step is to better understand how we can leverage strong time-decay characteristic of CI/CD data. This might help us to partition CI/CD dataset to reduce the size of CI/CD database tables.
Iterations
Work required to achieve our next CI/CD scaling target is tracked in the CI/CD Scaling epic.
- ✓ Migrate primary keys to big integers on GitLab.com.
- ✓ Implement the new architecture of builds queuing on GitLab.com.
- Make the new builds queuing architecture generally available.
- Partition CI/CD data using time-decay pattern.
Status
|-------------|--------------| | Created at | 21.01.2021 | | Approved at | 26.04.2021 | | Updated at | 06.12.2021 |
Status: In progress.
Who
Proposal:
| Role | Who |
|---|---|
| Author | Grzegorz Bizon |
| Architecture Evolution Coach | Kamil Trzciński |
| Engineering Leader | Cheryl Li |
| Product Manager | Jackie Porter |
| Domain Expert / Verify | Fabio Pitino |
| Domain Expert / Database | Jose Finotto |
| Domain Expert / PostgreSQL | Nikolay Samokhvalov |
DRIs:
| Role | Who |
|---|---|
| Leadership | Cheryl Li |
| Product | Jackie Porter |
| Engineering | Grzegorz Bizon |
Domain experts:
| Area | Who |
|---|---|
| Domain Expert / Verify | Fabio Pitino |
| Domain Expert / Verify | Marius Bobin |
| Domain Expert / Database | Jose Finotto |
| Domain Expert / PostgreSQL | Nikolay Samokhvalov |