560 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
560 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
import discussionWithTwoUnresolvedNotes from 'test_fixtures/merge_requests/resolved_diff_discussion.json';
|
|
import { DESC, ASC, NOTEABLE_TYPE_MAPPING } from '~/notes/constants';
|
|
import * as getters from '~/notes/stores/getters';
|
|
import {
|
|
notesDataMock,
|
|
userDataMock,
|
|
noteableDataMock,
|
|
individualNote,
|
|
collapseNotesMock,
|
|
discussionMock,
|
|
discussion1,
|
|
discussion2,
|
|
discussion3,
|
|
resolvedDiscussion1,
|
|
authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
unresolvableDiscussion,
|
|
draftComments,
|
|
draftReply,
|
|
draftDiffDiscussion,
|
|
} from '../mock_data';
|
|
|
|
// Helper function to ensure that we're using the same schema across tests.
|
|
const createDiscussionNeighborParams = (discussionId, diffOrder, step) => ({
|
|
discussionId,
|
|
diffOrder,
|
|
step,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const asDraftDiscussion = (x) => ({ ...x, individual_note: true });
|
|
const createRootState = () => {
|
|
return {
|
|
diffs: {
|
|
diffFiles: [
|
|
{ ...authoritativeDiscussionFile },
|
|
{
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc2', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile2', order: 1 },
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc3', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile3', order: 2 },
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
describe('Getters Notes Store', () => {
|
|
let state;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
state = {
|
|
discussions: [individualNote],
|
|
targetNoteHash: 'hash',
|
|
lastFetchedAt: 'timestamp',
|
|
isNotesFetched: false,
|
|
notesData: notesDataMock,
|
|
userData: userDataMock,
|
|
noteableData: noteableDataMock,
|
|
descriptionVersions: 'descriptionVersions',
|
|
discussionSortOrder: DESC,
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('showJumpToNextDiscussion', () => {
|
|
it('should return true if there are 2 or more unresolved discussions', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate: ['123', '456'],
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.showJumpToNextDiscussion(state, localGetters)()).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return false if there are 1 or less unresolved discussions', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate: ['123'],
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.showJumpToNextDiscussion(state, localGetters)()).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('discussions', () => {
|
|
let batchComments = null;
|
|
|
|
const getDiscussions = () => getters.discussions(state, {}, { batchComments });
|
|
|
|
describe('without batchComments module', () => {
|
|
it('should return all discussions in the store', () => {
|
|
expect(getDiscussions()).toEqual([individualNote]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should transform discussion to individual notes in timeline view', () => {
|
|
state.discussions = [discussionMock];
|
|
state.isTimelineEnabled = true;
|
|
|
|
const discussions = getDiscussions();
|
|
|
|
expect(discussions.length).toEqual(discussionMock.notes.length);
|
|
discussions.forEach((discussion) => {
|
|
expect(discussion.individual_note).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(discussion.id).toBe(discussion.notes[0].id);
|
|
expect(discussion.created_at).toBe(discussion.notes[0].created_at);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('with batchComments', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
batchComments = { drafts: [...draftComments, draftReply, draftDiffDiscussion] };
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each`
|
|
discussionSortOrder | expectation
|
|
${ASC} | ${[individualNote, ...draftComments.map(asDraftDiscussion)]}
|
|
${DESC} | ${[...draftComments.reverse().map(asDraftDiscussion), individualNote]}
|
|
`(
|
|
'only appends draft comments (discussionSortOrder=$discussionSortOrder)',
|
|
({ discussionSortOrder, expectation }) => {
|
|
state.discussionSortOrder = discussionSortOrder;
|
|
|
|
expect(getDiscussions()).toEqual(expectation);
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('hasDrafts', () => {
|
|
it.each`
|
|
rootGetters | expected
|
|
${{}} | ${false}
|
|
${{ 'batchComments/hasDrafts': true }} | ${true}
|
|
${{ 'batchComments/hasDrafts': false }} | ${false}
|
|
`('with rootGetters=$rootGetters, returns $expected', ({ rootGetters, expected }) => {
|
|
expect(getters.hasDrafts({}, {}, {}, rootGetters)).toBe(expected);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('resolvedDiscussionsById', () => {
|
|
it('ignores unresolved system notes', () => {
|
|
const [discussion] = discussionWithTwoUnresolvedNotes;
|
|
discussion.notes[0].resolved = true;
|
|
discussion.notes[1].resolved = false;
|
|
state.discussions.push(discussion);
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.resolvedDiscussionsById(state)).toEqual({
|
|
[discussion.id]: discussion,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Collapsed notes', () => {
|
|
const stateCollapsedNotes = {
|
|
discussions: collapseNotesMock,
|
|
targetNoteHash: 'hash',
|
|
lastFetchedAt: 'timestamp',
|
|
|
|
notesData: notesDataMock,
|
|
userData: userDataMock,
|
|
noteableData: noteableDataMock,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it('should return a single system note when a description was updated multiple times', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.discussions(stateCollapsedNotes, {}, {}).length).toEqual(1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('targetNoteHash', () => {
|
|
it('should return `targetNoteHash`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.targetNoteHash(state)).toEqual('hash');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('getNotesData', () => {
|
|
it('should return all data in `notesData`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.getNotesData(state)).toEqual(notesDataMock);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('getNoteableData', () => {
|
|
it('should return all data in `noteableData`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.getNoteableData(state)).toEqual(noteableDataMock);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('getUserData', () => {
|
|
it('should return all data in `userData`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.getUserData(state)).toEqual(userDataMock);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('notesById', () => {
|
|
it('should return the note for the given id', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.notesById(state)).toEqual({ 1390: individualNote.notes[0] });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('getCurrentUserLastNote', () => {
|
|
it('should return the last note of the current user', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.getCurrentUserLastNote(state)).toEqual(individualNote.notes[0]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('openState', () => {
|
|
it('should return the issue state', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.openState(state)).toEqual(noteableDataMock.state);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('isNotesFetched', () => {
|
|
it('should return the state for the fetching notes', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.isNotesFetched(state)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('allResolvableDiscussions', () => {
|
|
it('should return only resolvable discussions in same order', () => {
|
|
state.discussions = [
|
|
discussion3,
|
|
unresolvableDiscussion,
|
|
discussion1,
|
|
unresolvableDiscussion,
|
|
discussion2,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.allResolvableDiscussions(state)).toEqual([
|
|
discussion3,
|
|
discussion1,
|
|
discussion2,
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return empty array if there are no resolvable discussions', () => {
|
|
state.discussions = [unresolvableDiscussion, unresolvableDiscussion];
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.allResolvableDiscussions(state)).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff', () => {
|
|
it('should return all discussions IDs in diff order', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [discussion3, discussion1, discussion2],
|
|
};
|
|
const rootState = createRootState();
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff(state, localGetters, rootState)).toEqual([
|
|
'abc1',
|
|
'abc2',
|
|
'abc3',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// This is the same test as above, but it exercises the sorting algorithm
|
|
// for a "strange" Diff File ordering. The intent is to ensure that even if lots
|
|
// of shuffling has to occur, everything still works
|
|
|
|
it('should return all discussions IDs in unusual diff order', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [discussion3, discussion1, discussion2],
|
|
};
|
|
const rootState = {
|
|
diffs: {
|
|
diffFiles: [
|
|
// 2 is first, but should sort 2nd
|
|
{
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc2', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile2', order: 1 },
|
|
},
|
|
// 1 is second, but should sort 3rd
|
|
{ ...authoritativeDiscussionFile, ...{ order: 2 } },
|
|
// 3 is third, but should sort 1st
|
|
{
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc3', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile3', order: 0 },
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff(state, localGetters, rootState)).toEqual([
|
|
'abc3',
|
|
'abc2',
|
|
'abc1',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should use the discussions array order if the files don't have explicit order values", () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [discussion3, discussion1, discussion2], // This order is used!
|
|
};
|
|
const auth1 = { ...authoritativeDiscussionFile };
|
|
const auth2 = {
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc2', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile2' },
|
|
};
|
|
const auth3 = {
|
|
...authoritativeDiscussionFile,
|
|
...{ id: 'abc3', file_identifier_hash: 'discfile3' },
|
|
};
|
|
const rootState = {
|
|
diffs: { diffFiles: [auth2, auth1, auth3] }, // This order is not used!
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
delete auth1.order;
|
|
delete auth2.order;
|
|
delete auth3.order;
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff(state, localGetters, rootState)).toEqual([
|
|
'abc3',
|
|
'abc1',
|
|
'abc2',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return empty array if all discussions have been resolved', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [resolvedDiscussion1],
|
|
};
|
|
const rootState = createRootState();
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff(state, localGetters, rootState)).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate', () => {
|
|
it('should return all discussions in date ascending order', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [discussion3, discussion1, discussion2],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate(state, localGetters)).toEqual([
|
|
'abc2',
|
|
'abc1',
|
|
'abc3',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return empty array if all discussions have been resolved', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
allResolvableDiscussions: [resolvedDiscussion1],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate(state, localGetters)).toEqual([]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate: ['123', '456'],
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff: ['abc', 'def'],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it('should return IDs ordered by diff when diffOrder param is true', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered(state, localGetters)(true)).toEqual([
|
|
'abc',
|
|
'def',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return IDs ordered by date when diffOrder param is not true', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered(state, localGetters)(false)).toEqual([
|
|
'123',
|
|
'456',
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered(state, localGetters)(undefined)).toEqual([
|
|
'123',
|
|
'456',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('isLastUnresolvedDiscussion', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered: () => ['123', '456', '789'],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it('should return true if the discussion id provided is the last', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.isLastUnresolvedDiscussion(state, localGetters)('789')).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return false if the discussion id provided is not the last', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.isLastUnresolvedDiscussion(state, localGetters)('123')).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(getters.isLastUnresolvedDiscussion(state, localGetters)('456')).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor', () => {
|
|
let localGetters;
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered: () => ['123', '456', '789'],
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
{ step: 1, id: '123', expected: '456' },
|
|
{ step: 1, id: '456', expected: '789' },
|
|
{ step: 1, id: '789', expected: '123' },
|
|
{ step: -1, id: '123', expected: '789' },
|
|
{ step: -1, id: '456', expected: '123' },
|
|
{ step: -1, id: '789', expected: '456' },
|
|
].forEach(({ step, id, expected }) => {
|
|
it(`with step ${step} and id ${id}, returns next value`, () => {
|
|
const params = createDiscussionNeighborParams(id, true, step);
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor(state, localGetters)(params)).toBe(
|
|
expected,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('with 1 unresolved discussion', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered: () => ['123'],
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
{ step: 1, id: '123', expected: '123' },
|
|
{ step: -1, id: '123', expected: '123' },
|
|
].forEach(({ step, id, expected }) => {
|
|
it(`with step ${step} and match, returns only value`, () => {
|
|
const params = createDiscussionNeighborParams(id, true, step);
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor(state, localGetters)(params)).toBe(
|
|
expected,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('with no match, returns only value', () => {
|
|
const params = createDiscussionNeighborParams('bogus', true, 1);
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor(state, localGetters)(params)).toBe('123');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('with 0 unresolved discussions', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsOrdered: () => [],
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
[{ step: 1 }, { step: -1 }].forEach(({ step }) => {
|
|
it(`with step ${step}, returns undefined`, () => {
|
|
const params = createDiscussionNeighborParams('bogus', true, step);
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
getters.findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor(state, localGetters)(params),
|
|
).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor aliases', () => {
|
|
let neighbor;
|
|
let findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor;
|
|
let localGetters;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
neighbor = {};
|
|
findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor = jest.fn(() => neighbor);
|
|
localGetters = { findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor };
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('nextUnresolvedDiscussionId', () => {
|
|
it('should return result of find neighbor', () => {
|
|
const expectedParams = createDiscussionNeighborParams('123', true, 1);
|
|
const result = getters.nextUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGetters)('123', true);
|
|
|
|
expect(findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedParams);
|
|
expect(result).toBe(neighbor);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('previosuUnresolvedDiscussionId', () => {
|
|
it('should return result of find neighbor', () => {
|
|
const expectedParams = createDiscussionNeighborParams('123', true, -1);
|
|
const result = getters.previousUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGetters)('123', true);
|
|
|
|
expect(findUnresolvedDiscussionIdNeighbor).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedParams);
|
|
expect(result).toBe(neighbor);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('firstUnresolvedDiscussionId', () => {
|
|
const localGetters = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate: ['123', '456'],
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff: ['abc', 'def'],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it('should return the first discussion id by diff when diffOrder param is true', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.firstUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGetters)(true)).toBe('abc');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should return the first discussion id by date when diffOrder param is not true', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.firstUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGetters)(false)).toBe('123');
|
|
expect(getters.firstUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGetters)(undefined)).toBe('123');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should be falsy if all discussions are resolved', () => {
|
|
const localGettersFalsy = {
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff: [],
|
|
unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDate: [],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.firstUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGettersFalsy)(true)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(getters.firstUnresolvedDiscussionId(state, localGettersFalsy)(false)).toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('getDiscussion', () => {
|
|
it('returns discussion by ID', () => {
|
|
state.discussions.push({ id: '1' });
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.getDiscussion(state)('1')).toEqual({ id: '1' });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('descriptionVersions', () => {
|
|
it('should return `descriptionVersions`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.descriptionVersions(state)).toEqual('descriptionVersions');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('sortDirection', () => {
|
|
it('should return `discussionSortOrder`', () => {
|
|
expect(getters.sortDirection(state)).toBe(DESC);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('canUserAddIncidentTimelineEvents', () => {
|
|
it.each`
|
|
userData | noteableData | expected
|
|
${{ can_add_timeline_events: true }} | ${{ type: NOTEABLE_TYPE_MAPPING.Incident }} | ${true}
|
|
${{ can_add_timeline_events: true }} | ${{ type: NOTEABLE_TYPE_MAPPING.Issue }} | ${false}
|
|
${null} | ${{ type: NOTEABLE_TYPE_MAPPING.Incident }} | ${false}
|
|
${{ can_add_timeline_events: false }} | ${{ type: NOTEABLE_TYPE_MAPPING.Incident }} | ${false}
|
|
`(
|
|
'with userData=$userData and noteableData=$noteableData, expected=$expected',
|
|
({ userData, noteableData, expected }) => {
|
|
Object.assign(state, {
|
|
userData,
|
|
noteableData,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(getters.canUserAddIncidentTimelineEvents(state)).toBe(expected);
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|