kotovalexarian-likes-gitlab/sortix--sortix
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/sortix/sortix.git synced 2023-02-13 20:55:38 -05:00
Code Releases Activity
sortix--sortix/kernel/include/sortix/stack.h

55 lines
1.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
/*******************************************************************************
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
Copyright(C) Jonas 'Sortie' Termansen 2012, 2013, 2014.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Update copyright headers of old files to the current format.
2013-07-10 09:26:01 -04:00
This file is part of Sortix.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Update copyright headers of old files to the current format.
2013-07-10 09:26:01 -04:00
Sortix is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
version.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Update copyright headers of old files to the current format.
2013-07-10 09:26:01 -04:00
Sortix is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more
details.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Update copyright headers of old files to the current format.
2013-07-10 09:26:01 -04:00
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
Sortix. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
sortix/stack.h
Declares stack_t and associated flags.
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
*******************************************************************************/
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
#ifndef INCLUDE_SORTIX_STACK_H
#define INCLUDE_SORTIX_STACK_H
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Split parts of <features.h> into <sys/cdefs.h>.
2013-10-13 07:04:27 -04:00
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
#include <sys/__/types.h>
Maintain fsbase and gsbase as per-thread registers. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-09-14 12:59:15 -04:00
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
__BEGIN_DECLS
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
#ifndef __size_t_defined
#define __size_t_defined
#define __need_size_t
#include <stddef.h>
#endif
#define SS_ONSTACK (1<<0)
#define SS_DISABLE (1<<1)
#define __SS_SUPPORTED_FLAGS (SS_ONSTACK | SS_DISABLE)
typedef struct
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
{
Implement signals. Note: This is an incompatible ABI change.
2013-08-04 14:24:59 -04:00
void* ss_sp;
size_t ss_size;
int ss_flags;
} stack_t;
Added sforkr(2) that controls the child registers as well. sfork(2) now calls sforkr(2) with the current registers. This will prove useful in creating threads, where user-space now can fully control what state the child will start in. This is unlike the Linux clone system call that accepts a pointer to the child stack; this is more powerful and somehow simpler. Note that this will create a rather raw thread; no thread initization has been done by the standard thread API (when it is implemented), so this feature shouldn't be used by programmers unless they know what they are doing. fork(2) now calls sfork(2) directly. Also removed fork(2) and sfork(2) from the kernel as they are done using sforkr(2) now. So technically they aren't system calls right now, but that could always change.
2012-04-05 17:00:47 -04:00
__END_DECLS
#endif
Copy permalink