mirror of
https://github.com/moby/moby.git
synced 2022-11-09 12:21:53 -05:00
160 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
160 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing to Docker
|
|
|
|
Want to hack on Docker? Awesome! Here are instructions to get you started. They are probably not perfect, please let us know if anything feels
|
|
wrong or incomplete.
|
|
|
|
## Contribution guidelines
|
|
|
|
### Pull requests are always welcome
|
|
|
|
We are always thrilled to receive pull requests, and do our best to
|
|
process them as fast as possible. Not sure if that typo is worth a pull
|
|
request? Do it! We will appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
If your pull request is not accepted on the first try, don't be
|
|
discouraged! If there's a problem with the implementation, hopefully you
|
|
received feedback on what to improve.
|
|
|
|
We're trying very hard to keep Docker lean and focused. We don't want it
|
|
to do everything for everybody. This means that we might decide against
|
|
incorporating a new feature. However, there might be a way to implement
|
|
that feature *on top of* docker.
|
|
|
|
### Discuss your design on the mailing list
|
|
|
|
We recommend discussing your plans [on the mailing
|
|
list](https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/docker-dev)
|
|
before starting to code - especially for more ambitious contributions.
|
|
This gives other contributors a chance to point you in the right
|
|
direction, give feedback on your design, and maybe point out if someone
|
|
else is working on the same thing.
|
|
|
|
### Create issues...
|
|
|
|
Any significant improvement should be documented as [a github
|
|
issue](https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues) before anybody
|
|
starts working on it.
|
|
|
|
### ...but check for existing issues first!
|
|
|
|
Please take a moment to check that an issue doesn't already exist
|
|
documenting your bug report or improvement proposal. If it does, it
|
|
never hurts to add a quick "+1" or "I have this problem too". This will
|
|
help prioritize the most common problems and requests.
|
|
|
|
### Conventions
|
|
|
|
Fork the repo and make changes on your fork in a feature branch:
|
|
|
|
- If it's a bugfix branch, name it XXX-something where XXX is the number of the
|
|
issue
|
|
- If it's a feature branch, create an enhancement issue to announce your
|
|
intentions, and name it XXX-something where XXX is the number of the issue.
|
|
|
|
Submit unit tests for your changes. Go has a great test framework built in; use
|
|
it! Take a look at existing tests for inspiration. Run the full test suite on
|
|
your branch before submitting a pull request.
|
|
|
|
Make sure you include relevant updates or additions to documentation when
|
|
creating or modifying features.
|
|
|
|
Write clean code. Universally formatted code promotes ease of writing, reading,
|
|
and maintenance. Always run `go fmt` before committing your changes. Most
|
|
editors have plugins that do this automatically, and there's also a git
|
|
pre-commit hook:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
curl -o .git/hooks/pre-commit https://raw.github.com/edsrzf/gofmt-git-hook/master/fmt-check && chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Pull requests descriptions should be as clear as possible and include a
|
|
reference to all the issues that they address.
|
|
|
|
Code review comments may be added to your pull request. Discuss, then make the
|
|
suggested modifications and push additional commits to your feature branch. Be
|
|
sure to post a comment after pushing. The new commits will show up in the pull
|
|
request automatically, but the reviewers will not be notified unless you
|
|
comment.
|
|
|
|
Before the pull request is merged, make sure that you squash your commits into
|
|
logical units of work using `git rebase -i` and `git push -f`. After every
|
|
commit the test suite should be passing. Include documentation changes in the
|
|
same commit so that a revert would remove all traces of the feature or fix.
|
|
|
|
Commits that fix or close an issue should include a reference like `Closes #XXX`
|
|
or `Fixes #XXX`, which will automatically close the issue when merged.
|
|
|
|
Add your name to the AUTHORS file, but make sure the list is sorted and your
|
|
name and email address match your git configuration. The AUTHORS file is
|
|
regenerated occasionally from the git commit history, so a mismatch may result
|
|
in your changes being overwritten.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Decision process
|
|
|
|
### How are decisions made?
|
|
|
|
Short answer: with pull requests to the docker repository.
|
|
|
|
Docker is an open-source project with an open design philosophy. This means that the repository is the source of truth for EVERY aspect of the project,
|
|
including its philosophy, design, roadmap and APIs. *If it's part of the project, it's in the repo. It's in the repo, it's part of the project.*
|
|
|
|
As a result, all decisions can be expressed as changes to the repository. An implementation change is a change to the source code. An API change is a change to
|
|
the API specification. A philosophy change is a change to the philosophy manifesto. And so on.
|
|
|
|
All decisions affecting docker, big and small, follow the same 3 steps:
|
|
|
|
* Step 1: Open a pull request. Anyone can do this.
|
|
|
|
* Step 2: Discuss the pull request. Anyone can do this.
|
|
|
|
* Step 3: Accept or refuse a pull request. The relevant maintainer does this (see below "Who decides what?")
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Who decides what?
|
|
|
|
So all decisions are pull requests, and the relevant maintainer makes the decision by accepting or refusing the pull request.
|
|
But how do we identify the relevant maintainer for a given pull request?
|
|
|
|
Docker follows the timeless, highly efficient and totally unfair system known as [Benevolent dictator for life](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_Dictator_for_Life),
|
|
with yours truly, Solomon Hykes, in the role of BDFL.
|
|
This means that all decisions are made by default by me. Since making every decision myself would be highly unscalable, in practice decisions are spread across multiple maintainers.
|
|
|
|
The relevant maintainer for a pull request is assigned in 3 steps:
|
|
|
|
* Step 1: Determine the subdirectory affected by the pull request. This might be src/registry, docs/source/api, or any other part of the repo.
|
|
|
|
* Step 2: Find the MAINTAINERS file which affects this directory. If the directory itself does not have a MAINTAINERS file, work your way up the the repo hierarchy until you find one.
|
|
|
|
* Step 3: The first maintainer listed is the primary maintainer. The pull request is assigned to him. He may assign it to other listed maintainers, at his discretion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### I'm a maintainer, should I make pull requests too?
|
|
|
|
Primary maintainers are not required to create pull requests when changing their own subdirectory, but secondary maintainers are.
|
|
|
|
### Who assigns maintainers?
|
|
|
|
Solomon.
|
|
|
|
### How can I become a maintainer?
|
|
|
|
* Step 1: learn the component inside out
|
|
* Step 2: make yourself useful by contributing code, bugfixes, support etc.
|
|
* Step 3: volunteer on the irc channel (#docker@freenode)
|
|
|
|
Don't forget: being a maintainer is a time investment. Make sure you will have time to make yourself available.
|
|
You don't have to be a maintainer to make a difference on the project!
|
|
|
|
### What are a maintainer's responsibility?
|
|
|
|
It is every maintainer's responsibility to:
|
|
|
|
* 1) Expose a clear roadmap for improving their component.
|
|
* 2) Deliver prompt feedback and decisions on pull requests.
|
|
* 3) Be available to anyone with questions, bug reports, criticism etc. on their component. This includes irc, github requests and the mailing list.
|
|
* 4) Make sure their component respects the philosophy, design and roadmap of the project.
|
|
|
|
### How is this process changed?
|
|
|
|
Just like everything else: by making a pull request :)
|