mirror of
https://github.com/ruby/ruby.git
synced 2022-11-09 12:17:21 -05:00
1.8 KiB
1.8 KiB
Remarks
Just run it with no argument:
ruby entry.rb
(Anyway it is just a no-op program. The above command only verifies that entry.rb is a valid Ruby program.)
I confirmed the following implementations/platforms:
- ruby 2.5.0p0 (2017-12-25 revision 61468) [x64-mingw32]
Description
First, look at
https://docs.ruby-lang.org/ja/latest/doc/spec=2flexical.html#reserved
and then, look at entry.rb.
The source code of entry.rb consists only of reserved words of Ruby, and all the reserved words are used in the code, in a way that the code forms a valid Ruby program. No compile error, no warning, or no runtime error.
Internals
Difficult (and interesting) points of the theme are:
- Since many of the reserved words define program structures, we cannot
use them independently. For instance,
retry
must be insiderescue
, orbreak
/next
/redo
must be inside a looping construct. Or, jump-out statements cannot occur at a position that requires a value;if return then true end
is a "void value expression" syntax error. - Inserting newlines for each 6 word (to match with the spec html) is also an interesting challenge, since Ruby is sensitive to newlines.
Tricks used in the code are:
- def/alias/undef can take even reserved words as parameters.
That is,
def class ... end
defines a method namedclass
. The feature is crucial since otherwiseBEGIN
etc inevitably introduces non-reserved tokens (like{}
). defined?
can take some reserved words too (which I didn't know until trying to write this program.)- "void value expression" can be avoided by using
or
orand
.if begin return end then true end
is a syntax error, butif begin false or return end then true end
is not.
Limitation
Sad to say that it's not a "perfect pangram". It uses 'alias' and 'undef' twice, and 'end' 4 times.