thoughtbot--shoulda-matchers/CONTRIBUTING.md

212 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Contributing to Shoulda Matchers
We've put a lot of work into making improvements to Shoulda Matchers, but we
always welcome changes and improvements from the community!
Have a fix for a problem you've been running into or an idea for a new feature
you think would be useful? Simply follow these instructions:
1. [Read and understand the Code of Conduct](#code-of-conduct).
1. Fork this repo and clone your fork to somewhere on your machine.
1. [Ensure that you have a working environment](#setting-up-your-environment).
1. Read up on the [architecture of the gem](#architecture), [how to run
tests](#running-tests), and [the code style we use in this
project](#code-style).
1. Cut a new branch and write a failing test for the feature or bugfix you plan
on implementing.
1. [Make sure your branch is well managed as you go
along](#managing-your-branch).
1. [Update the inline documentation if you're making a change to the
API](#documentation).
1. [Refrain from updating the changelog.](#a-word-on-the-changelog)
1. Push to your fork and submit a pull request.
1. [Ensure that the test suite passes on Travis and make any necessary changes
to your branch to bring it to green.](#continuous-integration)
Although we maintain Shoulda Matchers in our free time, we try to respond to
contributions in a timely manner. Once we look at your pull request, we may give
you feedback. For instance, we may suggest some changes to make to your code to
fit within the project style or discuss alternate ways of addressing the issue
in question. Assuming we're happy with everything, we'll then bring your changes
into master. Now you're a contributor!
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
---
## Code of Conduct
If this is your first time contributing, please read the [Code of Conduct]. We
want to create a space in which everyone is allowed to contribute, and we
enforce the policies outline in this document.
[Code of Conduct]: https://thoughtbot.com/open-source-code-of-conduct
## Setting up your environment
The setup script will install all dependencies necessary for working on the
project:
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
```bash
bin/setup
```
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
## Architecture
This project follows the typical structure for a gem: code is located in `lib`
and tests are in `spec`.
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
### Matchers
All of the matchers are broken up by the type of example group they apply to:
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
* `{lib,spec/unit}/shoulda/matchers/action_controller*` for ActionController
matchers
* `{lib,spec/unit}/shoulda/matchers/active_model*` for ActiveModel matchers
* `{lib,spec/unit}/shoulda/matchers/active_record*` for ActiveRecord matchers
* `{lib,spec/unit}/shoulda/matchers/independent*` for matchers that can be used
in any example group
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
There are other files in the project, of course, but these are likely the ones
you'll be most interested in.
### Tests
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
In addition, tests are broken up into two categories:
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
* `spec/unit`
* `spec/acceptance`
A word about the tests, by the way: they're admittedly the most complicated part
of this gem, and there are a few different strategies that we've introduced at
various points in time to set up objects for tests across all specs, some of
which are old and some of which are new. The best approach for writing tests is
probably to copy an existing test in the same file as where you want to add a
new test.
## Code style
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
We follow a derivative of the [unofficial Ruby style guide] created by the
Rubocop developers. You can view our Rubocop configuration [here], but here are
some key differences:
* Use single quotes for strings.
* When breaking up methods across multiple lines, place the `.` at the end of
the line instead of the beginning.
* Don't use conditional modifiers (i.e. `x if y`); place the beginning and
ending of conditionals on their own lines.
* Use an 80-character line-length except for `describe`, `context`, `it`, and
`specify` lines in tests.
* For arrays, hashes, and method arguments that span multiple lines, place a
trailing comma at the end of the last item.
* Collection methods are spelled `detect`, `inject`, `map`, and `select`.
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
[unofficial Ruby style guide]: https://github.com/rubocop-hq/ruby-style-guide
[here]: .rubocop.yml
2012-03-19 00:39:15 +00:00
## Running tests
### Unit tests
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
Unit tests are the most common kind of tests in the gem. They exercise matcher
code file by file in the context of a real Rails application. This application
is created and loaded every time you run `rspec`. Because of this, it can be
expensive to run individual tests. To save time, the best way to run unit tests
is by using [Zeus].
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
[Zeus]: https://github.com/burke/zeus
2018-01-24 06:02:06 +00:00
You'll want to start by running `zeus start` in one shell. Then in another
shell, instead of using `bundle exec rspec` to run tests, you'll use `bundle
exec zeus rspec`. So for instance, you might say:
```bash
bundle exec zeus rspec spec/unit/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_inclusion_of_matcher_spec.rb
```
### Acceptance tests
The acceptance tests exercise matchers in the context of a real Ruby or Rails
application. Unlike unit tests, this application is set up and torn down for
each test.
Whereas you make use of Zeus to run unit tests, you make use of Appraisal for
acceptance tests. [Appraisal] lets you run tests against multiple versions of
Rails and Ruby, and in fact, this is baked into the test suite. This means that
if you're trying to run a single test file, you'll need to specify which
appraisal to use. For instance, you can't simply say:
[Appraisal]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/appraisal
```bash
bundle exec rspec spec/acceptance/active_model_integration_spec.rb
```
Instead, you need to say:
```bash
bundle exec appraisal 5.1 rspec spec/acceptance/active_model_integration_spec.rb
```
You can get a list of valid appraisals by running the following command and
inspecting the output:
```bash
bundle exec appraisal --help
```
### All tests
In order to run all of the tests, simply run:
```bash
bundle exec rake
```
## Managing your branch
* Use well-crafted commit messages, providing context if possible. [Tim Pope's
guide] was a wonderful piece on this topic when it came out and we still find
it to be helpful even today.
* Squash "WIP" commits and remove merge commits by rebasing your branch against
`master`. We try to keep our commit history as clean as possible. so we really
[Tim Pope's guide]: https://tbaggery.com/2008/04/19/a-note-about-git-commit-messages.html
## Documentation
As you navigate the codebase, you may notice certain classes and methods that
are prefaced with inline documentation. This documentation is written and
generated using [YARD][yard] and is published [online][rubydocs].
[rubydocs]: https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs
[yard]: https://github.com/lsegal/yard
We ensure that the documentation is up to date before we issue a release, but
sometimes we don't catch everything. So if your changes end up extending or
updating the API, it helps us greatly to update the docs at the same time.
## A word on the changelog
You may also notice that we have a changelog in the form of [NEWS.md](NEWS.md).
You may be tempted to include changes to this in your branch, but don't worry
about this -- we'll take care of it!
## Continuous integration
While running `bundle exec rake` is a great way to check your work, this command
will only run your tests against the latest supported Ruby and Rails version.
Ultimately, though, you'll want to ensure that your changes work in all possible
environments. We make use of [Travis][travis] to do this work for us. Travis
will kick in after you push up a branch or open a PR. It takes 15-20 minutes to
run a complete build, which you are free to
[monitor as it progresses][shoulda-matchers-on-travis].
[shoulda-matchers-on-travis]: https://travis-ci.org/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers
So what happens if the build fails in some way? Don't fear! Click on a failed
job and scroll through its output to determine the cause of the failure. You'll
want to make changes to your branch and push them up until the entire build is
green. It may take a bit of time, but overall it is worth it and it helps us
immensely!
[travis]: https://travis-ci.org/