Add comments explaining why we don't make `<img>`s responsive by default

Refs #18178

[ci skip]
This commit is contained in:
Chris Rebert 2015-11-05 13:18:42 -08:00
parent 4d17a04a27
commit be1232c580
2 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
// Responsive images (ensure images don't scale beyond their parents)
//
// This is purposefully opt-in via an explicit class rather than being the default for all `<img>`s.
// We previously tried the "images are responsive by default" approach in Bootstrap v2,
// and abandoned it in Bootstrap v3 because it breaks lots of third-party widgets (including Google Maps)
// which weren't expecting the images within themselves to be involuntarily resized.
// See also https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/18178
.img-fluid {
@include img-fluid();
}

View File

@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ img {
// By default, `<img>`s are `inline-block`. This assumes that, and vertically
// centers them. This won't apply should you reset them to `block` level.
vertical-align: middle;
// Note: `<img>`s are deliberately not made responsive by default.
// For the rationale behind this, see the comments on the `.img-fluid` class.
}