gitlab-org--gitlab-foss/spec/models/note_spec.rb

390 lines
12 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

2012-10-09 08:14:17 +00:00
# == Schema Information
#
# Table name: notes
#
2012-11-19 18:24:05 +00:00
# id :integer not null, primary key
2012-10-09 08:14:17 +00:00
# note :text
# noteable_type :string(255)
# author_id :integer
# created_at :datetime
# updated_at :datetime
2012-10-09 08:14:17 +00:00
# project_id :integer
# attachment :string(255)
# line_code :string(255)
2013-01-03 19:09:18 +00:00
# commit_id :string(255)
# noteable_id :integer
2013-10-01 12:15:28 +00:00
# system :boolean default(FALSE), not null
# st_diff :text
2012-10-09 08:14:17 +00:00
#
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
require 'spec_helper'
describe Note do
describe "Associations" do
it { should belong_to(:project) }
it { should belong_to(:noteable) }
it { should belong_to(:author).class_name('User') }
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
end
describe "Mass assignment" do
end
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
describe "Validation" do
it { should validate_presence_of(:note) }
it { should validate_presence_of(:project) }
end
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
describe "Voting score" do
let(:project) { create(:project) }
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
it "recognizes a neutral note" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = create(:votable_note, note: "This is not a +1 note")
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
note.should_not be_upvote
2012-09-08 00:08:35 +00:00
note.should_not be_downvote
end
it "recognizes a neutral emoji note" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = build(:votable_note, note: "I would :+1: this, but I don't want to")
2012-09-08 00:08:35 +00:00
note.should_not be_upvote
note.should_not be_downvote
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
end
it "recognizes a +1 note" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = create(:votable_note, note: "+1 for this")
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
note.should be_upvote
end
it "recognizes a +1 emoji as a vote" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = build(:votable_note, note: ":+1: for this")
note.should be_upvote
end
it "recognizes a thumbsup emoji as a vote" do
note = build(:votable_note, note: ":thumbsup: for this")
note.should be_upvote
end
2012-09-08 00:08:35 +00:00
it "recognizes a -1 note" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = create(:votable_note, note: "-1 for this")
2012-09-08 00:08:35 +00:00
note.should be_downvote
end
it "recognizes a -1 emoji as a vote" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note = build(:votable_note, note: ":-1: for this")
2012-09-08 00:08:35 +00:00
note.should be_downvote
end
it "recognizes a thumbsdown emoji as a vote" do
note = build(:votable_note, note: ":thumbsdown: for this")
note.should be_downvote
end
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
end
let(:project) { create(:project) }
2012-03-14 13:31:31 +00:00
describe "Commit notes" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
let!(:note) { create(:note_on_commit, note: "+1 from me") }
let!(:commit) { note.noteable }
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
2012-10-13 14:23:12 +00:00
it "should be accessible through #noteable" do
note.commit_id.should == commit.id
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.noteable.should be_a(Commit)
note.noteable.should == commit
2012-10-13 14:23:12 +00:00
end
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
it "should save a valid note" do
note.commit_id.should == commit.id
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.noteable == commit
2012-10-13 14:23:12 +00:00
end
it "should be recognized by #for_commit?" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.should be_for_commit
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
end
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
it "should not be votable" do
note.should_not be_votable
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
end
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
end
describe "Commit diff line notes" do
2013-01-15 13:19:14 +00:00
let!(:note) { create(:note_on_commit_diff, note: "+1 from me") }
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
let!(:commit) { note.noteable }
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
it "should save a valid note" do
note.commit_id.should == commit.id
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.noteable.id.should == commit.id
2012-10-13 14:23:12 +00:00
end
it "should be recognized by #for_diff_line?" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.should be_for_diff_line
end
it "should be recognized by #for_commit_diff_line?" do
note.should be_for_commit_diff_line
end
it "should not be votable" do
note.should_not be_votable
end
end
describe "Issue notes" do
let!(:note) { create(:note_on_issue, note: "+1 from me") }
it "should not be votable" do
note.should be_votable
end
end
describe "Merge request notes" do
let!(:note) { create(:note_on_merge_request, note: "+1 from me") }
it "should be votable" do
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
note.should be_votable
end
end
describe "Merge request diff line notes" do
2013-01-15 13:19:14 +00:00
let!(:note) { create(:note_on_merge_request_diff, note: "+1 from me") }
2012-10-30 02:27:36 +00:00
it "should not be votable" do
note.should_not be_votable
2012-01-21 12:54:32 +00:00
end
end
describe '#create_status_change_note' do
Merge Request on forked projects The good: - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work). - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate The questionable: - Events only know about target projects - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target - All operations performed in the satellite The bad: - Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between) (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos) Fixes: Make test repos/satellites only create when needed -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap) -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually -fixed remote removal -How to merge renders properly -Update emails to show project/branches -Edit MR doesn't set target branch -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test -Added back a test around merge request observer -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well -Signifant speed ups for tests -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests -Remove wiki schema update Fixes for search/search results -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
2013-04-25 14:15:33 +00:00
let(:project) { create(:project) }
let(:thing) { create(:issue, project: project) }
let(:author) { create(:user) }
let(:status) { 'new_status' }
subject { Note.create_status_change_note(thing, project, author, status, nil) }
it 'creates and saves a Note' do
should be_a Note
subject.id.should_not be_nil
end
its(:noteable) { should == thing }
Merge Request on forked projects The good: - You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work). - Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects - Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests - Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate The questionable: - Events only know about target projects - Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target - All operations performed in the satellite The bad: - Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between) (for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos) Fixes: Make test repos/satellites only create when needed -Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap) -project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually -fixed remote removal -How to merge renders properly -Update emails to show project/branches -Edit MR doesn't set target branch -Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test -Added back a test around merge request observer -Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers -Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well -Signifant speed ups for tests -Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests -Remove wiki schema update Fixes for search/search results -Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects -updated search results to reference the correct (target) project -udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
2013-04-25 14:15:33 +00:00
its(:project) { should == thing.project }
its(:author) { should == author }
its(:note) { should =~ /Status changed to #{status}/ }
it 'appends a back-reference if a closing mentionable is supplied' do
commit = double('commit', gfm_reference: 'commit 123456')
n = Note.create_status_change_note(thing, project, author, status, commit)
n.note.should =~ /Status changed to #{status} by commit 123456/
end
end
describe '#create_assignee_change_note' do
let(:project) { create(:project) }
let(:thing) { create(:issue, project: project) }
let(:author) { create(:user) }
let(:assignee) { create(:user) }
subject { Note.create_assignee_change_note(thing, project, author, assignee) }
context 'creates and saves a Note' do
it { should be_a Note }
its(:id) { should_not be_nil }
end
its(:noteable) { should == thing }
its(:project) { should == thing.project }
its(:author) { should == author }
its(:note) { should =~ /Reassigned to @#{assignee.username}/ }
context 'assignee is removed' do
let(:assignee) { nil }
its(:note) { should =~ /Assignee removed/ }
end
end
describe '#create_cross_reference_note' do
let(:project) { create(:project) }
let(:author) { create(:user) }
let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
let(:mergereq) { create(:merge_request, :simple, target_project: project, source_project: project) }
let(:commit) { project.repository.commit }
# Test all of {issue, merge request, commit} in both the referenced and referencing
# roles, to ensure that the correct information can be inferred from any argument.
context 'issue from a merge request' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(issue, mergereq, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable) { should == issue }
its(:project) { should == issue.project }
its(:author) { should == author }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in merge request !#{mergereq.iid}_" }
end
context 'issue from a commit' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(issue, commit, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable) { should == issue }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in commit #{commit.sha}_" }
end
context 'merge request from an issue' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(mergereq, issue, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable) { should == mergereq }
its(:project) { should == mergereq.project }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in issue ##{issue.iid}_" }
end
context 'commit from a merge request' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(commit, mergereq, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable) { should == commit }
its(:project) { should == project }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in merge request !#{mergereq.iid}_" }
end
context 'commit contained in a merge request' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(mergereq.commits.first, mergereq, author, project) }
it { should be_nil }
end
context 'commit from issue' do
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(commit, issue, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable_type) { should == "Commit" }
its(:noteable_id) { should be_nil }
its(:commit_id) { should == commit.id }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in issue ##{issue.iid}_" }
end
context 'commit from commit' do
let(:parent_commit) { commit.parents.first }
subject { Note.create_cross_reference_note(commit, parent_commit, author, project) }
it { should be_valid }
its(:noteable_type) { should == "Commit" }
its(:noteable_id) { should be_nil }
its(:commit_id) { should == commit.id }
its(:note) { should == "_mentioned in commit #{parent_commit.id}_" }
end
end
describe '#cross_reference_exists?' do
let(:project) { create :project }
let(:author) { create :user }
let(:issue) { create :issue }
let(:commit0) { project.repository.commit }
let(:commit1) { project.repository.commit('HEAD~2') }
before do
Note.create_cross_reference_note(issue, commit0, author, project)
end
it 'detects if a mentionable has already been mentioned' do
Note.cross_reference_exists?(issue, commit0).should be_true
end
it 'detects if a mentionable has not already been mentioned' do
Note.cross_reference_exists?(issue, commit1).should be_false
end
context 'commit on commit' do
before do
Note.create_cross_reference_note(commit0, commit1, author, project)
end
it { Note.cross_reference_exists?(commit0, commit1).should be_true }
it { Note.cross_reference_exists?(commit1, commit0).should be_false }
end
end
describe '#system?' do
let(:project) { create(:project) }
let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
let(:other) { create(:issue, project: project) }
let(:author) { create(:user) }
let(:assignee) { create(:user) }
it 'should recognize user-supplied notes as non-system' do
@note = create(:note_on_issue)
@note.should_not be_system
end
it 'should identify status-change notes as system notes' do
@note = Note.create_status_change_note(issue, project, author, 'closed', nil)
@note.should be_system
end
it 'should identify cross-reference notes as system notes' do
@note = Note.create_cross_reference_note(issue, other, author, project)
@note.should be_system
end
it 'should identify assignee-change notes as system notes' do
@note = Note.create_assignee_change_note(issue, project, author, assignee)
@note.should be_system
end
end
describe :authorization do
before do
@p1 = create(:project)
@p2 = create(:project)
@u1 = create(:user)
@u2 = create(:user)
@u3 = create(:user)
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
@abilities = Six.new
@abilities << Ability
end
describe :read do
before do
@p1.project_members.create(user: @u2, access_level: ProjectMember::GUEST)
@p2.project_members.create(user: @u3, access_level: ProjectMember::GUEST)
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
end
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u1, :read_note, @p1).should be_false }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u2, :read_note, @p1).should be_true }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u3, :read_note, @p1).should be_false }
end
describe :write do
before do
@p1.project_members.create(user: @u2, access_level: ProjectMember::DEVELOPER)
@p2.project_members.create(user: @u3, access_level: ProjectMember::DEVELOPER)
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
end
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u1, :write_note, @p1).should be_false }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u2, :write_note, @p1).should be_true }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u3, :write_note, @p1).should be_false }
end
describe :admin do
before do
@p1.project_members.create(user: @u1, access_level: ProjectMember::REPORTER)
@p1.project_members.create(user: @u2, access_level: ProjectMember::MASTER)
@p2.project_members.create(user: @u3, access_level: ProjectMember::MASTER)
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
end
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u1, :admin_note, @p1).should be_false }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u2, :admin_note, @p1).should be_true }
it { @abilities.allowed?(@u3, :admin_note, @p1).should be_false }
end
end
it_behaves_like 'an editable mentionable' do
let(:issue) { create :issue, project: project }
let(:subject) { create :note, noteable: issue, project: project }
let(:backref_text) { issue.gfm_reference }
let(:set_mentionable_text) { ->(txt) { subject.note = txt } }
end
2011-10-08 21:36:38 +00:00
end