37 KiB
stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
none | unassigned | To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
Migration Style Guide
When writing migrations for GitLab, you have to take into account that these are run by hundreds of thousands of organizations of all sizes, some with many years of data in their database.
In addition, having to take a server offline for an upgrade small or big is a big burden for most organizations. For this reason, it is important that your migrations are written carefully, can be applied online, and adhere to the style guide below.
Migrations are not allowed to require GitLab installations to be taken offline unless absolutely necessary.
When downtime is necessary the migration has to be approved by:
- The VP of Engineering
- A Backend Maintainer
- A Database Maintainer
An up-to-date list of people holding these titles can be found at https://about.gitlab.com/company/team/.
When writing your migrations, also consider that databases might have stale data or inconsistencies and guard for that. Try to make as few assumptions as possible about the state of the database.
Please don't depend on GitLab-specific code since it can change in future versions. If needed copy-paste GitLab code into the migration to make it forward compatible.
For GitLab.com, please take into consideration that regular migrations (under db/migrate
)
are run before Canary is deployed,
and post-deployment migrations (db/post_migrate
) are run after the deployment to production has finished.
Schema Changes
Changes to the schema should be committed to db/structure.sql
. This
file is automatically generated by Rails, so you normally should not
edit this file by hand. If your migration is adding a column to a
table, that column is added at the bottom. Please do not reorder
columns manually for existing tables as this causes confusion to
other people using db/structure.sql
generated by Rails.
When your local database in your GDK is diverging from the schema from
master
it might be hard to cleanly commit the schema changes to
Git. In that case you can use the scripts/regenerate-schema
script to
regenerate a clean db/structure.sql
for the migrations you're
adding. This script applies all migrations found in db/migrate
or db/post_migrate
, so if there are any migrations you don't want to
commit to the schema, rename or remove them. If your branch is not
targeting master
you can set the TARGET
environment variable.
# Regenerate schema against `master`
scripts/regenerate-schema
# Regenerate schema against `12-9-stable-ee`
TARGET=12-9-stable-ee scripts/regenerate-schema
What Requires Downtime?
The document "What Requires Downtime?" specifies various database operations, such as
- dropping and renaming columns
- changing column constraints and types
- adding and dropping indexes, tables, and foreign keys
and whether they require downtime and how to work around that whenever possible.
Downtime Tagging
Every migration must specify if it requires downtime or not, and if it should require downtime it must also specify a reason for this. This is required even if 99% of the migrations don't require downtime as this makes it easier to find the migrations that do require downtime.
To tag a migration, add the following two constants to the migration class' body:
DOWNTIME
: a boolean that when set totrue
indicates the migration requires downtime.DOWNTIME_REASON
: a String containing the reason for the migration requiring downtime. This constant must be set whenDOWNTIME
is set totrue
.
For example:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
DOWNTIME = true
DOWNTIME_REASON = 'This migration requires downtime because ...'
def change
...
end
end
It is an error (that is, CI fails) if the DOWNTIME
constant is missing
from a migration class.
Reversibility
Your migration must be reversible. This is very important, as it should be possible to downgrade in case of a vulnerability or bugs.
In your migration, add a comment describing how the reversibility of the migration was tested.
Some migrations cannot be reversed. For example, some data migrations can't be
reversed because we lose information about the state of the database before the migration.
You should still create a down
method with a comment, explaining why
the changes performed by the up
method can't be reversed, so that the
migration itself can be reversed, even if the changes performed during the migration
can't be reversed:
def down
# no-op
# comment explaining why changes performed by `up` cannot be reversed.
end
Atomicity
By default, migrations are single transaction. That is, a transaction is opened at the beginning of the migration, and committed after all steps are processed.
Running migrations in a single transaction makes sure that if one of the steps fails, none of the steps are executed, leaving the database in valid state. Therefore, either:
- Put all migrations in one single-transaction migration.
- If necessary, put most actions in one migration and create a separate migration for the steps that cannot be done in a single transaction.
For example, if you create an empty table and need to build an index for it,
it is recommended to use a regular single-transaction migration and the default
rails schema statement: add_index
.
This is a blocking operation, but it doesn't cause problems because the table is not yet used,
and therefore it does not have any records yet.
Heavy operations in a single transaction
When using a single-transaction migration, a transaction holds a database connection
for the duration of the migration, so you must make sure the actions in the migration
do not take too much time: GitLab.com’s production database has a 15s
timeout, so
in general, the cumulative execution time in a migration should aim to fit comfortably
in that limit. Singular query timings should fit within the standard limit
In case you need to insert, update, or delete a significant amount of data, you:
- Must disable the single transaction with
disable_ddl_transaction!
. - Should consider doing it in a Background Migration.
Retry mechanism when acquiring database locks
When changing the database schema, we use helper methods to invoke DDL (Data Definition Language) statements. In some cases, these DDL statements require a specific database lock.
Example:
def change
remove_column :users, :full_name, :string
end
Executing this migration requires an exclusive lock on the users
table. When the table
is concurrently accessed and modified by other processes, acquiring the lock may take
a while. The lock request is waiting in a queue and it may also block other queries
on the users
table once it has been enqueued.
More information about PostgresSQL locks: Explicit Locking
For stability reasons, GitLab.com has a specific statement_timeout
set. When the migration is invoked, any database query has
a fixed time to execute. In a worst-case scenario, the request sits in the
lock queue, blocking other queries for the duration of the configured statement timeout,
then failing with canceling statement due to statement timeout
error.
This problem could cause failed application upgrade processes and even application stability issues, since the table may be inaccessible for a short period of time.
To increase the reliability and stability of database migrations, the GitLab codebase
offers a helper method to retry the operations with different lock_timeout
settings
and wait time between the attempts. Multiple smaller attempts to acquire the necessary
lock allow the database to process other statements.
Examples
Removing a column:
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
def up
with_lock_retries do
remove_column :users, :full_name
end
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
add_column :users, :full_name, :string
end
end
Removing a foreign key:
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
def up
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key :issues, :projects
end
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
add_foreign_key :issues, :projects
end
end
Changing default value for a column:
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
def up
with_lock_retries do
change_column_default :merge_requests, :lock_version, from: nil, to: 0
end
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
change_column_default :merge_requests, :lock_version, from: 0, to: nil
end
end
Creating a new table with a foreign key:
We can simply wrap the create_table
method with with_lock_retries
:
def up
with_lock_retries do
create_table :issues do |t|
t.references :project, index: true, null: false, foreign_key: { on_delete: :cascade }
t.string :title, limit: 255
end
end
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
drop_table :issues
end
end
Creating a new table when we have two foreign keys:
For this, we need three migrations:
- Creating the table without foreign keys (with the indices).
- Add foreign key to the first table.
- Add foreign key to the second table.
Creating the table:
def up
create_table :imports do |t|
t.bigint :project_id, null: false
t.bigint :user_id, null: false
t.string :jid, limit: 255
end
add_index :imports, :project_id
add_index :imports, :user_id
end
def down
drop_table :imports
end
Adding foreign key to projects
:
We can use the add_concurrenct_foreign_key
method in this case, as this helper method
has the lock retries built into it.
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
add_concurrent_foreign_key :imports, :projects, column: :project_id, on_delete: :cascade
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key :imports, column: :project_id
end
end
Adding foreign key to users
:
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
add_concurrent_foreign_key :imports, :users, column: :user_id, on_delete: :cascade
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key :imports, column: :user_id
end
end
Usage with disable_ddl_transaction!
Generally the with_lock_retries
helper should work with disable_ddl_transaction!
. A custom RuboCop rule ensures that only allowed methods can be placed within the lock retries block.
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
with_lock_retries do
add_column :users, :name, :text
end
add_text_limit :users, :name, 255 # Includes constraint validation (full table scan)
end
The RuboCop rule generally allows standard Rails migration methods, listed below. This example causes a Rubocop offense:
disable_ddl_transaction!
def up
with_lock_retries do
add_concurrent_index :users, :name
end
end
When to use the helper method
The with_lock_retries
helper method can be used when you normally use
standard Rails migration helper methods. Calling more than one migration
helper is not a problem if they're executed on the same table.
Using the with_lock_retries
helper method is advised when a database
migration involves one of the high-traffic tables.
Example changes:
add_foreign_key
/remove_foreign_key
add_column
/remove_column
change_column_default
create_table
/drop_table
The with_lock_retries
method cannot be used within the change
method, you must manually define the up
and down
methods to make the migration reversible.
How the helper method works
- Iterate 50 times.
- For each iteration, set a pre-configured
lock_timeout
. - Try to execute the given block. (
remove_column
). - If
LockWaitTimeout
error is raised, sleep for the pre-configuredsleep_time
and retry the block. - If no error is raised, the current iteration has successfully executed the block.
For more information check the Gitlab::Database::WithLockRetries
class. The with_lock_retries
helper method is implemented in the Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
module.
In a worst-case scenario, the method:
- Executes the block for a maximum of 50 times over 40 minutes.
- Most of the time is spent in a pre-configured sleep period after each iteration.
- After the 50th retry, the block is executed without
lock_timeout
, just like a standard migration invocation. - If a lock cannot be acquired, the migration fails with
statement timeout
error.
The migration might fail if there is a very long running transaction (40+ minutes)
accessing the users
table.
Multi-Threading
Sometimes a migration might need to use multiple Ruby threads to speed up a
migration. For this to work your migration needs to include the module
Gitlab::Database::MultiThreadedMigration
:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
include Gitlab::Database::MultiThreadedMigration
end
You can then use the method with_multiple_threads
to perform work in separate
threads. For example:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
include Gitlab::Database::MultiThreadedMigration
def up
with_multiple_threads(4) do
disable_statement_timeout
# ...
end
end
end
Here the call to disable_statement_timeout
uses the connection local to
the with_multiple_threads
block, instead of re-using the global connection
pool. This ensures each thread has its own connection object, and doesn't time
out when trying to obtain one.
PostgreSQL has a maximum amount of connections that it allows. This limit can vary from installation to installation. As a result, it's recommended you do not use more than 32 threads in a single migration. Usually, 4-8 threads should be more than enough.
Removing indexes
If the table is not empty when removing an index, make sure to use the method
remove_concurrent_index
instead of the regular remove_index
method.
The remove_concurrent_index
method drops indexes concurrently, so no locking is required,
and there is no need for downtime. To use this method, you must disable single-transaction mode
by calling the method disable_ddl_transaction!
in the body of your migration
class like so:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
disable_ddl_transaction!
INDEX_NAME = 'index_name'
def up
remove_concurrent_index :table_name, :column_name, name: INDEX_NAME
end
end
Note that it is not necessary to check if the index exists prior to
removing it, however it is required to specify the name of the
index that is being removed. This can be done either by passing the name
as an option to the appropriate form of remove_index
or remove_concurrent_index
,
or more simply by using the remove_concurrent_index_by_name
method. Explicitly
specifying the name is important to ensure the correct index is removed.
For a small table (such as an empty one or one with less than 1,000
records),
it is recommended to use remove_index
in a single-transaction migration,
combining it with other operations that don't require disable_ddl_transaction!
.
Disabling an index
There are certain situations in which you might want to disable an index before removing it. See the maintenance operations guide for more details.
Adding indexes
Before adding an index, consider if this one is necessary. There are situations in which an index might not be required, like:
- The table is small (less than
1,000
records) and it's not expected to exponentially grow in size. - Any existing indexes filter out enough rows.
- The reduction in query timings after the index is added is not significant.
Additionally, wide indexes are not required to match all filter criteria of queries, we just need to cover enough columns so that the index lookup has a small enough selectivity. Please review our Adding Database indexes guide for more details.
When adding an index to a non-empty table make sure to use the method
add_concurrent_index
instead of the regular add_index
method.
The add_concurrent_index
method automatically creates concurrent indexes
when using PostgreSQL, removing the need for downtime.
To use this method, you must disable single-transactions mode
by calling the method disable_ddl_transaction!
in the body of your migration
class like so:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
DOWNTIME = false
disable_ddl_transaction!
INDEX_NAME = 'index_name'
def up
add_concurrent_index :table, :column, name: INDEX_NAME
end
def down
remove_concurrent_index :table, :column, name: INDEX_NAME
end
end
You must explicitly name indexes that are created with more complex definitions beyond table name, column name(s) and uniqueness constraint. Consult the Adding Database Indexes guide for more details.
If you need to add a unique index, please keep in mind there is the possibility of existing duplicates being present in the database. This means that should always first add a migration that removes any duplicates, before adding the unique index.
For a small table (such as an empty one or one with less than 1,000
records),
it is recommended to use add_index
in a single-transaction migration, combining it with other
operations that don't require disable_ddl_transaction!
.
Testing for existence of indexes
If a migration requires conditional logic based on the absence or presence of an index, you must test for existence of that index using its name. This helps avoids problems with how Rails compares index definitions, which can lead to unexpected results. For more details, review the Adding Database Indexes guide.
The easiest way to test for existence of an index by name is to use the
index_name_exists?
method, but the index_exists?
method can also
be used with a name option. For example:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
include Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
INDEX_NAME = 'index_name'
def up
# an index must be conditionally created due to schema inconsistency
unless index_exists?(:table_name, :column_name, name: INDEX_NAME)
add_index :table_name, :column_name, name: INDEX_NAME
end
end
def down
# no op
end
end
Keep in mind that concurrent index helpers like add_concurrent_index
,
remove_concurrent_index
, and remove_concurrent_index_by_name
already
perform existence checks internally.
Adding foreign-key constraints
When adding a foreign-key constraint to either an existing or a new column also remember to add an index on the column.
This is required for all foreign-keys, e.g., to support efficient cascading deleting: when a lot of rows in a table get deleted, the referenced records need to be deleted too. The database has to look for corresponding records in the referenced table. Without an index, this results in a sequential scan on the table, which can take a long time.
Here's an example where we add a new column with a foreign key
constraint. Note it includes index: true
to create an index for it.
class Migration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
def change
add_reference :model, :other_model, index: true, foreign_key: { on_delete: :cascade }
end
end
When adding a foreign-key constraint to an existing column in a non-empty table,
we have to employ add_concurrent_foreign_key
and add_concurrent_index
instead of add_reference
.
If you have a new or empty table that doesn't reference a
high-traffic table,
we recommend that you use add_reference
in a single-transaction migration. You can
combine it with other operations that don't require disable_ddl_transaction!
.
You can read more about adding foreign key constraints to an existing column.
NOT NULL
constraints
Introduced in GitLab 13.0.
See the style guide on NOT NULL
constraints for more information.
Adding Columns With Default Values
With PostgreSQL 11 being the minimum version in GitLab 13.0 and later, adding columns with default values has become much easier and
the standard add_column
helper should be used in all cases.
Before PostgreSQL 11, adding a column with a default was problematic as it would
have caused a full table rewrite. The corresponding helper add_column_with_default
has been deprecated and is scheduled to be removed in a later release.
If a backport adding a column with a default value is needed for %12.9 or earlier versions,
it should use add_column_with_default
helper. If a large table
is involved, backporting to %12.9 is contraindicated.
Changing the column default
One might think that changing a default column with change_column_default
is an
expensive and disruptive operation for larger tables, but in reality it's not.
Take the following migration as an example:
class DefaultRequestAccessGroups < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.2]
DOWNTIME = false
def change
change_column_default(:namespaces, :request_access_enabled, from: false, to: true)
end
end
Migration above changes the default column value of one of our largest
tables: namespaces
. This can be translated to:
ALTER TABLE namespaces
ALTER COLUMN request_access_enabled
SET DEFAULT false
In this particular case, the default value exists and we're just changing the metadata for
request_access_enabled
column, which does not imply a rewrite of all the existing records
in the namespaces
table. Only when creating a new column with a default, all the records are going be rewritten.
NOTE: A faster ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a non-null default was introduced on PostgresSQL 11.0, removing the need of rewriting the table when a new column with a default value is added.
For the reasons mentioned above, it's safe to use change_column_default
in a single-transaction migration
without requiring disable_ddl_transaction!
.
Updating an existing column
To update an existing column to a particular value, you can use
update_column_in_batches
. This splits the updates into batches, so we
don't update too many rows at in a single statement.
This updates the column foo
in the projects
table to 10, where some_column
is 'hello'
:
update_column_in_batches(:projects, :foo, 10) do |table, query|
query.where(table[:some_column].eq('hello'))
end
If a computed update is needed, the value can be wrapped in Arel.sql
, so Arel
treats it as an SQL literal. It's also a required deprecation for Rails 6.
The below example is the same as the one above, but
the value is set to the product of the bar
and baz
columns:
update_value = Arel.sql('bar * baz')
update_column_in_batches(:projects, :foo, update_value) do |table, query|
query.where(table[:some_column].eq('hello'))
end
Like add_column_with_default
, there is a RuboCop cop to detect usage of this
on large tables. In the case of update_column_in_batches
, it may be acceptable
to run on a large table, as long as it is only updating a small subset of the
rows in the table, but do not ignore that without validating on the GitLab.com
staging environment - or asking someone else to do so for you - beforehand.
Dropping a database table
Dropping a database table is uncommon, and the drop_table
method
provided by Rails is generally considered safe. Before dropping the table,
please consider the following:
If your table has foreign keys on a high-traffic table (like projects
), then
the DROP TABLE
statement is likely to stall concurrent traffic until it fails with statement timeout error.
Table has no records (feature was never in use) and no foreign keys:
- Simply use the
drop_table
method in your migration.
def change
drop_table :my_table
end
Table has records but no foreign keys:
- First release: Remove the application code related to the table, such as models, controllers and services.
- Second release: Use the
drop_table
method in your migration.
def up
drop_table :my_table
end
def down
# create_table ...
end
Table has foreign keys:
- First release: Remove the application code related to the table, such as models, controllers, and services.
- Second release: Remove the foreign keys using the
with_lock_retries
helper method. Usedrop_table
in another migration file.
Migrations for the second release:
Removing the foreign key on the projects
table:
# first migration file
def up
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key :my_table, :projects
end
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
add_foreign_key :my_table, :projects
end
end
Dropping the table:
# second migration file
def up
drop_table :my_table
end
def down
# create_table ...
end
Integer column type
By default, an integer column can hold up to a 4-byte (32-bit) number. That is a max value of 2,147,483,647. Be aware of this when creating a column that holds file sizes in byte units. If you are tracking file size in bytes, this restricts the maximum file size to just over 2GB.
To allow an integer column to hold up to an 8-byte (64-bit) number, explicitly
set the limit to 8-bytes. This allows the column to hold a value up to
9,223,372,036,854,775,807
.
Rails migration example:
add_column(:projects, :foo, :integer, default: 10, limit: 8)
Strings and the Text data type
Introduced in GitLab 13.0.
See the text data type style guide for more information.
Timestamp column type
By default, Rails uses the timestamp
data type that stores timestamp data
without timezone information. The timestamp
data type is used by calling
either the add_timestamps
or the timestamps
method.
Also, Rails converts the :datetime
data type to the timestamp
one.
Example:
# timestamps
create_table :users do |t|
t.timestamps
end
# add_timestamps
def up
add_timestamps :users
end
# :datetime
def up
add_column :users, :last_sign_in, :datetime
end
Instead of using these methods, one should use the following methods to store timestamps with timezones:
add_timestamps_with_timezone
timestamps_with_timezone
datetime_with_timezone
This ensures all timestamps have a time zone specified. This, in turn, means existing timestamps don't suddenly use a different timezone when the system's timezone changes. It also makes it very clear which timezone was used in the first place.
Storing JSON in database
The Rails 5 natively supports JSONB
(binary JSON) column type.
Example migration adding this column:
class AddOptionsToBuildMetadata < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.0]
DOWNTIME = false
def change
add_column :ci_builds_metadata, :config_options, :jsonb
end
end
You have to use a serializer to provide a translation layer:
class BuildMetadata
serialize :config_options, Serializers::JSON # rubocop:disable Cop/ActiveRecordSerialize
end
When using a JSONB
column, use the JsonSchemaValidator to keep control of the data being inserted over time.
class BuildMetadata
validates :config_options, json_schema: { filename: 'build_metadata_config_option' }
end
Testing
See the Testing Rails migrations style guide.
Data migration
Please prefer Arel and plain SQL over usual ActiveRecord syntax. In case of
using plain SQL, you need to quote all input manually with quote_string
helper.
Example with Arel:
users = Arel::Table.new(:users)
users.group(users[:user_id]).having(users[:id].count.gt(5))
#update other tables with these results
Example with plain SQL and quote_string
helper:
select_all("SELECT name, COUNT(id) as cnt FROM tags GROUP BY name HAVING COUNT(id) > 1").each do |tag|
tag_name = quote_string(tag["name"])
duplicate_ids = select_all("SELECT id FROM tags WHERE name = '#{tag_name}'").map{|tag| tag["id"]}
origin_tag_id = duplicate_ids.first
duplicate_ids.delete origin_tag_id
execute("UPDATE taggings SET tag_id = #{origin_tag_id} WHERE tag_id IN(#{duplicate_ids.join(",")})")
execute("DELETE FROM tags WHERE id IN(#{duplicate_ids.join(",")})")
end
If you need more complex logic, you can define and use models local to a migration. For example:
class MyMigration < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base
self.table_name = 'projects'
end
def up
# Reset the column information of all the models that update the database
# to ensure the Active Record's knowledge of the table structure is current
Project.reset_column_information
# ... ...
end
end
When doing so be sure to explicitly set the model's table name, so it's not derived from the class name or namespace.
Be aware of the limitations when using models in migrations.
Renaming reserved paths
When a new route for projects is introduced, it could conflict with any existing records. The path for these records should be renamed, and the related data should be moved on disk.
Since we had to do this a few times already, there are now some helpers to help with this.
To use this you can include Gitlab::Database::RenameReservedPathsMigration::V1
in your migration. This provides 3 methods which you can pass one or more
paths that need to be rejected.
rename_root_paths
: Renames the path of all namespaces with the given name that don't have aparent_id
.rename_child_paths
: Renames the path of all namespaces with the given name that have aparent_id
.rename_wildcard_paths
: Renames the path of all projects, and all namespaces that have aproject_id
.
The path
column for these rows are renamed to their previous value followed
by an integer. For example: users
would turn into users0
Using models in migrations (discouraged)
The use of models in migrations is generally discouraged. As such models are contraindicated for background migrations, the model needs to be declared in the migration.
If using a model in the migrations, you should first
clear the column cache
using reset_column_information
.
This avoids problems where a column that you are using was altered and cached in a previous migration.
Example: Add a column my_column
to the users table
It is important not to leave out the User.reset_column_information
command, in order to ensure that the old schema is dropped from the cache and ActiveRecord loads the updated schema information.
class AddAndSeedMyColumn < ActiveRecord::Migration[6.0]
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
self.table_name = 'users'
end
def up
User.count # Any ActiveRecord calls on the model that caches the column information.
add_column :users, :my_column, :integer, default: 1
User.reset_column_information # The old schema is dropped from the cache.
User.find_each do |user|
user.my_column = 42 if some_condition # ActiveRecord sees the correct schema here.
user.save!
end
end
end
The underlying table is modified and then accessed via ActiveRecord.
Note that this also needs to be used if the table is modified in a previous, different migration,
if both migrations are run in the same db:migrate
process.
This results in the following. Note the inclusion of my_column
:
== 20200705232821 AddAndSeedMyColumn: migrating ==============================
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.483876 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.2ms) BEGIN
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.521660 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.4ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "user"
-- add_column(:users, :my_column, :integer, {:default=>1})
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.523309 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.8ms) ALTER TABLE "users" ADD "my_column" integer DEFAULT 1
-> 0.0016s
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.650641 #130101] DEBUG -- : AddAndSeedMyColumn::User Load (0.7ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" ORDER BY "users"."id" ASC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1000]]
D, [2020-07-18T00:41:26.851769 #459802] DEBUG -- : AddAndSeedMyColumn::User Update (1.1ms) UPDATE "users" SET "my_column" = $1, "updated_at" = $2 WHERE "users"."id" = $3 [["my_column", 42], ["updated_at", "2020-07-17 23:41:26.849044"], ["id", 1]]
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.653648 #130101] DEBUG -- : ↳ config/initializers/config_initializers_active_record_locking.rb:13:in `_update_row'
== 20200705232821 AddAndSeedMyColumn: migrated (0.1706s) =====================
If you skip clearing the schema cache (User.reset_column_information
), the column is not
used by ActiveRecord and the intended changes are not made, leading to the result below,
where my_column
is missing from the query.
== 20200705232821 AddAndSeedMyColumn: migrating ==============================
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.483876 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.2ms) BEGIN
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.521660 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.4ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "user"
-- add_column(:users, :my_column, :integer, {:default=>1})
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.523309 #130101] DEBUG -- : (0.8ms) ALTER TABLE "users" ADD "my_column" integer DEFAULT 1
-> 0.0016s
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.650641 #130101] DEBUG -- : AddAndSeedMyColumn::User Load (0.7ms) SELECT "users".* FROM "users" ORDER BY "users"."id" ASC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1000]]
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.653459 #130101] DEBUG -- : AddAndSeedMyColumn::User Update (0.5ms) UPDATE "users" SET "updated_at" = $1 WHERE "users"."id" = $2 [["updated_at", "2020-07-05 23:37:12.652297"], ["id", 1]]
D, [2020-07-06T00:37:12.653648 #130101] DEBUG -- : ↳ config/initializers/config_initializers_active_record_locking.rb:13:in `_update_row'
== 20200705232821 AddAndSeedMyColumn: migrated (0.1706s) =====================
High traffic tables
Here's a list of current high-traffic tables.
Determining what tables are high-traffic can be difficult. Self-managed instances might use different features of GitLab with different usage patterns, thus making assumptions based on GitLab.com not enough.
To identify a high-traffic table for GitLab.com the following measures are considered. Note that the metrics linked here are GitLab-internal only:
- Read operations
- Number of records
- Size is greater than 10 GB
Any table which has some high read operation compared to current high-traffic tables might be a good candidate.