7 KiB
stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
Data Stores | Database | To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
Foreign Keys & Associations
When adding an association to a model you must also add a foreign key. For example, say you have the following model:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts
end
Add a foreign key here on column posts.user_id
. This ensures
that data consistency is enforced on database level. Foreign keys also mean that
the database can very quickly remove associated data (for example, when removing a
user), instead of Rails having to do this.
Adding Foreign Keys In Migrations
Foreign keys can be added concurrently using add_concurrent_foreign_key
as
defined in Gitlab::Database::MigrationHelpers
. See the Migration Style
Guide for more information.
Keep in mind that you can only safely add foreign keys to existing tables after
you have removed any orphaned rows. The method add_concurrent_foreign_key
does not take care of this so you must do so manually. See
adding foreign key constraint to an existing column.
Updating Foreign Keys In Migrations
Sometimes a foreign key constraint must be changed, preserving the column
but updating the constraint condition. For example, moving from
ON DELETE CASCADE
to ON DELETE SET NULL
or vice-versa.
PostgreSQL does not prevent you from adding overlapping foreign keys. It honors the most recently added constraint. This allows us to replace foreign keys without ever losing foreign key protection on a column.
To replace a foreign key:
The name of the foreign key constraint must be changed to add a new foreign key before removing the old one.
class ReplaceFkOnPackagesPackagesProjectId < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.0]
disable_ddl_transaction!
NEW_CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'fk_new'
def up
add_concurrent_foreign_key(:packages_packages, :projects, column: :project_id, on_delete: :nullify, validate: false, name: NEW_CONSTRAINT_NAME)
end
def down
with_lock_retries do
remove_foreign_key_if_exists(:packages_packages, column: :project_id, on_delete: :nullify, name: NEW_CONSTRAINT_NAME)
end
end
end
class ValidateFkNew < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.0]
NEW_CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'fk_new'
# foreign key added in <link to MR or path to migration adding new FK>
def up
validate_foreign_key(:packages_packages, name: NEW_CONSTRAINT_NAME)
end
def down
# no-op
end
end
- Remove the old foreign key:
class RemoveFkOld < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.0]
OLD_CONSTRAINT_NAME = 'fk_old'
# new foreign key added in <link to MR or path to migration adding new FK>
# and validated in <link to MR or path to migration validating new FK>
def up
remove_foreign_key_if_exists(:packages_packages, column: :project_id, on_delete: :cascade, name: OLD_CONSTRAINT_NAME)
end
def down
# Validation is skipped here, so if rolled back, this will need to be revalidated in a separate migration
add_concurrent_foreign_key(:packages_packages, :projects, column: :project_id, on_delete: :cascade, validate: false, name: OLD_CONSTRAINT_NAME)
end
end
Cascading Deletes
Every foreign key must define an ON DELETE
clause, and in 99% of the cases
this should be set to CASCADE
.
Indexes
When adding a foreign key in PostgreSQL the column is not indexed automatically, thus you must also add a concurrent index. Not doing so results in cascading deletes being very slow.
Naming foreign keys
By default Ruby on Rails uses the _id
suffix for foreign keys. So we should
only use this suffix for associations between two tables. If you want to
reference an ID on a third party platform the _xid
suffix is recommended.
The spec spec/db/schema_spec.rb
tests if all columns with the _id
suffix
have a foreign key constraint. So if that spec fails, don't add the column to
IGNORED_FK_COLUMNS
, but instead add the FK constraint, or consider naming it
differently.
Dependent Removals
Don't define options such as dependent: :destroy
or dependent: :delete
when
defining an association. Defining these options means Rails handles the
removal of data, instead of letting the database handle this in the most
efficient way possible.
In other words, this is bad and should be avoided at all costs:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :posts, dependent: :destroy
end
Should you truly have a need for this it should be approved by a database specialist first.
You should also not define any before_destroy
or after_destroy
callbacks on
your models unless absolutely required and only when approved by database
specialists. For example, if each row in a table has a corresponding file on a
file system it may be tempting to add a after_destroy
hook. This however
introduces non database logic to a model, and means we can no longer rely on
foreign keys to remove the data as this would result in the file system data
being left behind. In such a case you should use a service class instead that
takes care of removing non database data.
In cases where the relation spans multiple databases you have even
further problems using dependent: :destroy
or the above hooks. You can
read more about alternatives at Avoid dependent: :nullify
and
dependent: :destroy
across
databases.
Alternative primary keys with has_one
associations
Sometimes a has_one
association is used to create a one-to-one relationship:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :user_config
end
class UserConfig < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
In these cases, there may be an opportunity to remove the unnecessary id
column on the associated table, user_config.id
in this example. Instead,
the originating table ID can be used as the primary key for the associated
table:
create_table :user_configs, id: false do |t|
t.references :users, primary_key: true, default: nil, index: false, foreign_key: { on_delete: :cascade }
...
end
Setting default: nil
ensures a primary key sequence is not created, and since the primary key
automatically gets an index, we set index: false
to avoid creating a duplicate.
You also need to add the new primary key to the model:
class UserConfig < ActiveRecord::Base
self.primary_key = :user_id
belongs_to :user
end
Using a foreign key as primary key saves space but can make
batch counting in Service Ping less efficient.
Consider using a regular id
column if the table is relevant for Service Ping.