gitlab-org--gitlab-foss/.gitlab/merge_request_templates/New static analysis check.md

1.5 KiB

Description of the proposal

Check-list

  • Make sure this MR enables a static analysis check rule for new usage but ignores current offenses
  • Create a follow-up issue to fix the current offenses as a separate iteration: ISSUE_LINK
  • Mention this proposal in the relevant Slack channels (e.g. #development, #backend, #frontend)
  • If there is a choice to make between two potential styles, set up an emoji vote in the MR:
    • CHOICE_A: 🅰️
    • CHOICE_B: 🅱️
    • Vote yourself for both choices so that people know these are the choices
  • The MR doesn't have significant objections, and is getting a majority of 👍 vs 👎 (remember that we don't need to reach a consensus)
  • (If applicable) One style is getting a majority of vote (compared to the other choice)
  • (If applicable) Update the MR with the chosen style
  • Follow the review process as usual
  • Once approved and merged by a maintainer, mention it again:
    • In the relevant Slack channels (e.g. #development, #backend, #frontend)
    • (Optional depending on the impact of the change) In the Engineering Week in Review

/label ~"Engineering Productivity" ~"Style decision" ~"development guidelines" ~"static analysis"

/cc @gitlab-org/maintainers/rails-backend