7 KiB
stage | group | info |
---|---|---|
Manage | Compliance | To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments |
Audit Event Guide
This guide provides an overview of how Audit Events work, and how to instrument new audit events.
What are Audit Events?
Audit Events are a tool for GitLab owners and administrators to view records of important actions performed across the application.
Audit Event Schemas
To instrument an audit event, the following attributes should be provided:
Attribute | Type | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|---|
name |
String | false | Action name to be audited. Used for error tracking |
author |
User | true | User who authors the change |
scope |
User, Project, Group | true | Scope which the audit event belongs to |
target |
Object | true | Target object being audited |
message |
String | true | Message describing the action |
created_at |
DateTime | false | The time when the action occurred. Defaults to DateTime.current |
How to instrument new Audit Events
There are three ways of instrumenting audit events:
- Create a new class in
ee/lib/ee/audit/
and extendAuditEventService
- Call
AuditEventService
after a successful action - Call
Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit
passing an action block
This inconsistency leads to unexpected bugs, increases maintainer effort, and worsens the
developer experience. Therefore, we suggest you use Gitlab::Audit::Auditor
to
instrument new audit events.
With new service, we can instrument audit events in two ways:
- Using block for multiple events.
- Using standard method call for single events.
Using block to record multiple events
This method is useful when events are emitted deep in the call stack.
For example, we can record multiple audit events when the user updates a merge
request approval rule. As part of this user flow, we would like to audit changes
to both approvers and approval groups. In the initiating service
(for example, MergeRequestRuleUpdateService
), we can wrap the execute
call as follows:
# in the initiating service
audit_context = {
name: 'update_merge_approval_rule',
author: current_user,
scope: project_alpha,
target: merge_approval_rule,
message: 'Attempted to update an approval rule'
}
::Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit(audit_context) do
service.execute
end
In the model (for example, ApprovalProjectRule
), we can push audit events on model
callbacks (for example, after_save
or after_add
).
# in the model
include Auditable
def audit_add(model)
push_audit_event('Added an approver on Security rule')
end
def audit_remove(model)
push_audit_event('Removed an approver on Security rule')
end
This method does not support actions that are asynchronous, or span across multiple processes (for example, background jobs).
Using standard method call to record single event
This method allows recording single audit event and involves fewer moving parts.
if merge_approval_rule.save
audit_context = {
name: 'create_merge_approval_rule',
author: current_user,
scope: project_alpha,
target: merge_approval_rule,
message: 'Created a new approval rule',
created_at: DateTime.current # Useful for pre-dating an audit event when created asynchronously.
}
::Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit(audit_context)
end
Data volume considerations
Because every audit event is persisted to the database, consider the amount of data we expect to generate, and the rate of generation, for new
audit events. For new audit events that will produce a lot of data in the database, consider adding a
streaming-only audit event instead. If you have questions about this, feel free to ping
@gitlab-org/manage/compliance/backend
in an issue or merge request.
Audit Event instrumentation flows
The two ways we can instrument audit events have different flows.
Using block to record multiple events
We wrap the operation block in a Gitlab::Audit::Auditor
which captures the
initial audit context (that is, author
, scope
, target
) object that are
available at the time the operation is initiated.
Extra instrumentation is required in the interacted classes in the chain with
Auditable
mixin to add audit events to the Audit Event queue via Gitlab::Audit::EventQueue
.
The EventQueue
is stored in a local thread via SafeRequestStore
and then later
extracted when we record an audit event in Gitlab::Audit::Auditor
.
skinparam shadowing false
skinparam BoxPadding 10
skinparam ParticipantPadding 20
participant "Instrumented Class" as A
participant "Audit::Auditor" as A1 #LightBlue
participant "Audit::EventQueue" as B #LightBlue
participant "Interacted Class" as C
participant "AuditEvent" as D
A->A1: audit <b>{ block }
activate A1
A1->B: begin!
A1->C: <b>block.call
activate A1 #FFBBBB
activate C
C-->B: push [ message ]
C-->A1: true
deactivate A1
deactivate C
A1->B: read
activate A1 #FFBBBB
activate B
B-->A1: [ messages ]
deactivate B
A1->D: bulk_insert!
deactivate A1
A1->B: end!
A1-->A:
deactivate A1
Using standard method call to record single event
This method has a more straight-forward flow, and does not rely on EventQueue
and local thread.
skinparam shadowing false
skinparam BoxPadding 10
skinparam ParticipantPadding 20
participant "Instrumented Class" as A
participant "Audit::Auditor" as B #LightBlue
participant "AuditEvent" as C
A->B: audit
activate B
B->C: bulk_insert!
B-->A:
deactivate B
In addition to recording to the database, we also write these events to a log file.
Event streaming
All events where the entity is a Group
or Project
are recorded in the audit log, and also streamed to one or more
event streaming destinations. When the entity is a:
Group
, events are streamed to the group's root ancestor's event streaming destinations.Project
, events are streamed to the project's root ancestor's event streaming destinations.
You can add streaming-only events that are not stored in the GitLab database. This is primarily intended to be used for actions that generate a large amount of data. See this merge request for an example. This feature is under heavy development. Follow the parent epic for updates on feature development.