330 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
330 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: none
|
|
group: Style Guide
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
description: What to include in GitLab documentation pages.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Documentation topic types
|
|
|
|
At GitLab, we have not traditionally used types for our content. However, we are starting to
|
|
move in this direction, and we now use four primary topic types:
|
|
|
|
- [Concept](#concept)
|
|
- [Task](#task)
|
|
- [Reference](#reference)
|
|
- [Troubleshooting](#troubleshooting)
|
|
|
|
In general, each page in our docset contains multiple topics. (Each heading indicates a new topic.)
|
|
Each topic on a page should be a specific topic type. For example,
|
|
a page with the title `Pipelines` can include topics that are concepts and tasks.
|
|
|
|
A page might also contain only one type of information. These pages are generally one of our
|
|
[other content types](#other-types-of-content).
|
|
|
|
## Concept
|
|
|
|
A concept introduces a single feature or concept.
|
|
|
|
A concept should answer the questions:
|
|
|
|
- What is this?
|
|
- Why would I use it?
|
|
|
|
Think of everything someone might want to know if they've never heard of this concept before.
|
|
|
|
Don't tell them **how** to do this thing. Tell them **what it is**.
|
|
|
|
If you start describing another concept, start a new concept and link to it.
|
|
|
|
Also, do not use **Overview** or **Introduction** for the title. Instead,
|
|
use a noun or phrase that someone would search for.
|
|
|
|
Concepts should be in this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title (a noun, like "Widgets")
|
|
|
|
A paragraph that explains what this thing is.
|
|
|
|
Another paragraph that explains what this thing is.
|
|
|
|
Remember, if you start to describe about another concept, stop yourself.
|
|
Each concept should be about one concept only.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Task
|
|
|
|
A task gives instructions for how to complete a procedure.
|
|
|
|
Tasks should be in this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title (starts with an active verb, like "Create a widget" or "Delete a widget")
|
|
|
|
Do this task when you want to...
|
|
|
|
Prerequisites (optional):
|
|
|
|
- Thing 1
|
|
- Thing 2
|
|
- Thing 3
|
|
|
|
To do this task:
|
|
|
|
1. Location then action. (Go to this menu, then select this item.)
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
|
|
Task result (optional). Next steps (optional).
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Here is an example.
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Create an issue
|
|
|
|
Create an issue when you want to track bugs or future work.
|
|
|
|
Prerequisites:
|
|
|
|
- You must have at least the Developer role for a project.
|
|
|
|
To create an issue:
|
|
|
|
1. On the top bar, select **Menu > Projects** and find your project.
|
|
1. On the left sidebar, select **Issues > List**.
|
|
1. In the top right corner, select **New issue**.
|
|
1. Complete the fields. (If you have reference content that lists each field, link to it here.)
|
|
1. Select **Create issue**.
|
|
|
|
The issue is created. You can view it by going to **Issues > List**.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you have several tasks on a page that share prerequisites, you can use the title
|
|
**Prerequisites**, and link to it.
|
|
|
|
## Reference
|
|
|
|
Reference information should be in an easily-scannable format,
|
|
like a table or list. It's similar to a dictionary or encyclopedia entry.
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title (a noun, like "Pipeline settings" or "Administrator options")
|
|
|
|
Introductory sentence.
|
|
|
|
| Setting | Description |
|
|
|---------|-------------|
|
|
| **Name** | Descriptive sentence about the setting. |
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If a feature or concept has its own prerequisites, you can use reference
|
|
content to create a **Prerequisites** header for the information.
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
Troubleshooting can be one of two categories:
|
|
|
|
- **Troubleshooting task.** This information is written the same way as a [standard task](#task).
|
|
For example, "Run debug tools" or "Verify syntax."
|
|
- **Troubleshooting reference.** This information has a specific format.
|
|
|
|
Troubleshooting reference information should be in this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title (the error message or a description of it)
|
|
|
|
You might get an error that states <error message>.
|
|
|
|
This issue occurs when...
|
|
|
|
The workaround is...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For the heading:
|
|
|
|
- Consider including at least a partial error message.
|
|
- Use fewer than 70 characters.
|
|
|
|
If you do not put the full error in the title, include it in the body text.
|
|
|
|
## Other types of content
|
|
|
|
There are other types of content in the GitLab documentation that don't
|
|
classify as one of the four primary [topic types](#documentation-topic-types).
|
|
These include:
|
|
|
|
- [Tutorials](#tutorials)
|
|
- [Get started pages](#get-started)
|
|
- [Topics and resources pages](#topics-and-resources-pages)
|
|
|
|
In most cases, these pages are standalone.
|
|
|
|
### Tutorials
|
|
|
|
A tutorial is an end-to-end walkthrough of a complex workflow or scenario.
|
|
In general, you might consider using a tutorial when:
|
|
|
|
- The workflow requires a number of sequential steps where each step consists
|
|
of sub-steps.
|
|
- The steps cover a variety of GitLab features or third-party tools.
|
|
|
|
Tutorials are learning aids that complement our core documentation.
|
|
They do not introduce new features.
|
|
Always use the primary [topic types](#documentation-topic-types) to document new features.
|
|
|
|
Tutorials should be in this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title (starts with "Tutorial:" followed by an active verb, like "Tutorial: Create a website")
|
|
|
|
A paragraph that explains what the tutorial does, and the expected outcome.
|
|
|
|
To create a website:
|
|
|
|
1. [Do the first task](#do-the-first-task)
|
|
1. [Do the second task](#do-the-second-task)
|
|
|
|
Prerequisites (optional):
|
|
|
|
- Thing 1
|
|
- Thing 2
|
|
- Thing 3
|
|
|
|
## Do the first task
|
|
|
|
To do step 1:
|
|
|
|
1. First step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
|
|
## Do the second task
|
|
|
|
Before you begin, make sure you have [done the first task](#do-the-first-task).
|
|
|
|
To do step 2:
|
|
|
|
1. First step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Get started
|
|
|
|
A get started page is a set of steps to help a user get set up
|
|
quickly to use a single GitLab feature or tool.
|
|
It might consist of more than one task.
|
|
|
|
Get started pages should be in this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title ("Get started with <feature>")
|
|
|
|
Complete the following steps to ... .
|
|
|
|
1. First step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
1. Another step.
|
|
|
|
If you need to add more than one task,
|
|
consider using subsections for each distinct task.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Topics and resources pages
|
|
|
|
This is a page with a list of links that point to important sections
|
|
of documentation for a specific GitLab feature or tool.
|
|
|
|
We do not encourage the use of these types of pages.
|
|
Lists like this can get out of date quickly and offer little value to users.
|
|
We've included this type here because:
|
|
|
|
- There are existing pages in the documentation that follow this format,
|
|
and they should be standardized.
|
|
- They can sometimes help navigate a complex section of the documentation.
|
|
|
|
If you come across a page like this
|
|
or you have to create one, use this format:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Title ("Topics and resources for <feature>")
|
|
|
|
Brief sentence to describe the feature.
|
|
|
|
Refer to these resources for more information about <this feature>:
|
|
|
|
- Link 1
|
|
- Link 2
|
|
- Link 3
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Help and feedback section
|
|
|
|
This section ([introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-docs/-/merge_requests/319) in GitLab 11.4)
|
|
is displayed at the end of each document and can be omitted by adding a key into
|
|
the front matter:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
---
|
|
feedback: false
|
|
---
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The default is to leave it there. If you want to omit it from a document, you
|
|
must check with a technical writer before doing so.
|
|
|
|
### Disqus
|
|
|
|
We also have integrated the docs site with Disqus (introduced by
|
|
[!151](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-docs/-/merge_requests/151)),
|
|
allowing our users to post comments.
|
|
|
|
To omit only the comments from the feedback section, use the following key in
|
|
the front matter:
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
---
|
|
comments: false
|
|
---
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
We're hiding comments only in main index pages, such as [the main documentation index](../../index.md),
|
|
since its content is too broad to comment on. Before omitting Disqus, you must
|
|
check with a technical writer.
|
|
|
|
Note that after adding `feedback: false` to the front matter, it will omit
|
|
Disqus, therefore, don't add both keys to the same document.
|
|
|
|
The click events in the feedback section are tracked with Google Tag Manager.
|
|
The conversions can be viewed on Google Analytics by navigating to
|
|
**Behavior > Events > Top events > docs**.
|
|
|
|
## Guidelines for good practices
|
|
|
|
> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/36576/) in GitLab 13.2 as GitLab Development documentation.
|
|
|
|
*Good practice* examples demonstrate encouraged ways of writing code while
|
|
comparing with examples of practices to avoid. These examples are labeled as
|
|
*Bad* or *Good*. In GitLab development guidelines, when presenting the cases,
|
|
it's recommended to follow a *first-bad-then-good* strategy. First demonstrate
|
|
the *Bad* practice (how things *could* be done, which is often still working
|
|
code), and then how things *should* be done better, using a *Good* example. This
|
|
is typically an improved example of the same code.
|
|
|
|
Consider the following guidelines when offering examples:
|
|
|
|
- First, offer the *Bad* example, and then the *Good* one.
|
|
- When only one bad case and one good case is given, use the same code block.
|
|
- When more than one bad case or one good case is offered, use separated code
|
|
blocks for each. With many examples being presented, a clear separation helps
|
|
the reader to go directly to the good part. Consider offering an explanation
|
|
(for example, a comment, or a link to a resource) on why something is bad
|
|
practice.
|
|
- Better and best cases can be considered part of the good case(s) code block.
|
|
In the same code block, precede each with comments: `# Better` and `# Best`.
|
|
|
|
Although the bad-then-good approach is acceptable for the GitLab development
|
|
guidelines, do not use it for user documentation. For user documentation, use
|
|
*Do* and *Don't*. For examples, see the [Pajamas Design System](https://design.gitlab.com/content/punctuation/).
|