245 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
245 lines
9.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
stage: Govern
|
|
group: Compliance
|
|
info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Audit Event Guide
|
|
|
|
This guide provides an overview of how Audit Events work, and how to instrument
|
|
new audit events.
|
|
|
|
## What are Audit Events?
|
|
|
|
Audit Events are a tool for GitLab owners and administrators to view records of important
|
|
actions performed across the application.
|
|
|
|
## What should not be Audit Events?
|
|
|
|
While any events could trigger an Audit Event, not all events should. In general, events that are not good candidates for audit events are:
|
|
|
|
- Not attributable to one specific user.
|
|
- Not of specific interest to an administrator or owner persona.
|
|
- Are tracking information for product feature adoption.
|
|
- Are covered in the direction page's discussion on [what is not planned](https://about.gitlab.com/direction/manage/compliance/audit-events/#what-is-not-planned-right-now).
|
|
|
|
If you have any questions, please reach out to `@gitlab-org/manage/compliance` to see if an Audit Event, or some other approach, may be best for your event.
|
|
|
|
## Audit Event Schemas
|
|
|
|
To instrument an audit event, the following attributes should be provided:
|
|
|
|
| Attribute | Type | Required? | Description |
|
|
|:-------------|:---------------------|:----------|:------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| `name` | String | false | Action name to be audited. Represents the [type of the event](#event-type-definitions). Used for error tracking |
|
|
| `author` | User | true | User who authors the change |
|
|
| `scope` | User, Project, Group | true | Scope which the audit event belongs to |
|
|
| `target` | Object | true | Target object being audited |
|
|
| `message` | String | true | Message describing the action ([not translated](#i18n-and-the-audit-event-message-attribute)) |
|
|
| `created_at` | DateTime | false | The time when the action occurred. Defaults to `DateTime.current` |
|
|
|
|
## How to instrument new Audit Events
|
|
|
|
1. Create a [YAML type definition](#add-a-new-audit-event-type) for the new audit event.
|
|
1. Call `Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit`, passing an action block.
|
|
|
|
The following ways of instrumenting audit events are deprecated:
|
|
|
|
- Create a new class in `ee/lib/ee/audit/` and extend `AuditEventService`
|
|
- Call `AuditEventService` after a successful action
|
|
|
|
With `Gitlab::Audit::Auditor` service, we can instrument audit events in two ways:
|
|
|
|
- Using block for multiple events.
|
|
- Using standard method call for single events.
|
|
|
|
### Using block to record multiple events
|
|
|
|
This method is useful when events are emitted deep in the call stack.
|
|
|
|
For example, we can record multiple audit events when the user updates a merge
|
|
request approval rule. As part of this user flow, we would like to audit changes
|
|
to both approvers and approval groups. In the initiating service
|
|
(for example, `MergeRequestRuleUpdateService`), we can wrap the `execute` call as follows:
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
# in the initiating service
|
|
audit_context = {
|
|
name: 'update_merge_approval_rule',
|
|
author: current_user,
|
|
scope: project_alpha,
|
|
target: merge_approval_rule,
|
|
message: 'Attempted to update an approval rule'
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
::Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit(audit_context) do
|
|
service.execute
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In the model (for example, `ApprovalProjectRule`), we can push audit events on model
|
|
callbacks (for example, `after_save` or `after_add`).
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
# in the model
|
|
include Auditable
|
|
|
|
def audit_add(model)
|
|
push_audit_event('Added an approver on Security rule')
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def audit_remove(model)
|
|
push_audit_event('Removed an approver on Security rule')
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This method does not support actions that are asynchronous, or
|
|
span across multiple processes (for example, background jobs).
|
|
|
|
### Using standard method call to record single event
|
|
|
|
This method allows recording single audit event and involves fewer moving parts.
|
|
|
|
```ruby
|
|
if merge_approval_rule.save
|
|
audit_context = {
|
|
name: 'create_merge_approval_rule',
|
|
author: current_user,
|
|
scope: project_alpha,
|
|
target: merge_approval_rule,
|
|
message: 'Created a new approval rule',
|
|
created_at: DateTime.current # Useful for pre-dating an audit event when created asynchronously.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
::Gitlab::Audit::Auditor.audit(audit_context)
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Data volume considerations
|
|
|
|
Because every audit event is persisted to the database, consider the amount of data we expect to generate, and the rate of generation, for new
|
|
audit events. For new audit events that will produce a lot of data in the database, consider adding a
|
|
[streaming-only audit event](#event-streaming) instead. If you have questions about this, feel free to ping
|
|
`@gitlab-org/manage/compliance/backend` in an issue or merge request.
|
|
|
|
## Audit Event instrumentation flows
|
|
|
|
The two ways we can instrument audit events have different flows.
|
|
|
|
### Using block to record multiple events
|
|
|
|
We wrap the operation block in a `Gitlab::Audit::Auditor` which captures the
|
|
initial audit context (that is, `author`, `scope`, `target`) object that are
|
|
available at the time the operation is initiated.
|
|
|
|
Extra instrumentation is required in the interacted classes in the chain with
|
|
`Auditable` mixin to add audit events to the Audit Event queue via `Gitlab::Audit::EventQueue`.
|
|
|
|
The `EventQueue` is stored in a local thread via `SafeRequestStore` and then later
|
|
extracted when we record an audit event in `Gitlab::Audit::Auditor`.
|
|
|
|
```plantuml
|
|
skinparam shadowing false
|
|
skinparam BoxPadding 10
|
|
skinparam ParticipantPadding 20
|
|
|
|
participant "Instrumented Class" as A
|
|
participant "Audit::Auditor" as A1 #LightBlue
|
|
participant "Audit::EventQueue" as B #LightBlue
|
|
participant "Interacted Class" as C
|
|
participant "AuditEvent" as D
|
|
|
|
A->A1: audit <b>{ block }
|
|
activate A1
|
|
A1->B: begin!
|
|
A1->C: <b>block.call
|
|
activate A1 #FFBBBB
|
|
activate C
|
|
C-->B: push [ message ]
|
|
C-->A1: true
|
|
deactivate A1
|
|
deactivate C
|
|
A1->B: read
|
|
activate A1 #FFBBBB
|
|
activate B
|
|
B-->A1: [ messages ]
|
|
deactivate B
|
|
A1->D: bulk_insert!
|
|
deactivate A1
|
|
A1->B: end!
|
|
A1-->A:
|
|
deactivate A1
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Using standard method call to record single event
|
|
|
|
This method has a more straight-forward flow, and does not rely on `EventQueue`
|
|
and local thread.
|
|
|
|
```plantuml
|
|
skinparam shadowing false
|
|
skinparam BoxPadding 10
|
|
skinparam ParticipantPadding 20
|
|
|
|
participant "Instrumented Class" as A
|
|
participant "Audit::Auditor" as B #LightBlue
|
|
participant "AuditEvent" as C
|
|
|
|
A->B: audit
|
|
activate B
|
|
B->C: bulk_insert!
|
|
B-->A:
|
|
deactivate B
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In addition to recording to the database, we also write these events to
|
|
[a log file](../../administration/logs/index.md#audit_jsonlog).
|
|
|
|
## Event type definitions
|
|
|
|
> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/367847) in GitLab 15.4.
|
|
|
|
All new audit events must have a type definition stored in `config/audit_events/types/` that contains a single source of truth for every auditable event in GitLab.
|
|
|
|
### Add a new audit event type
|
|
|
|
To add a new audit event type:
|
|
|
|
1. Create a new file in `config/audit_events/types/` with the filename matching the name of the event type. For example, a definition for the event type triggered when a
|
|
user is added to a project might be stored in `config/audit_events/types/project_add_user.yml`.
|
|
1. Add contents to the file that conform to the [schema](#schema) defined in `config/audit_events/types/type_schema.json`.
|
|
1. Ensure that all calls to `Gitlab::Audit::Auditor` use the `name` defined in your file.
|
|
|
|
### Schema
|
|
|
|
| Field | Required | Description |
|
|
| ----- | -------- |--------------|
|
|
| `name` | yes | Unique, lowercase and underscored name describing the type of event. Must match the filename. |
|
|
| `description` | yes | Human-readable description of how this event is triggered |
|
|
| `group` | yes | Name of the group that introduced this audit event. For example, `manage::compliance` |
|
|
| `introduced_by_issue` | yes | Issue URL that proposed the addition of this type |
|
|
| `introduced_by_mr` | yes | MR URL that added this new type |
|
|
| `milestone` | yes | Milestone in which this type was added |
|
|
| `saved_to_database` | yes | Indicate whether to persist events to database and JSON logs |
|
|
| `streamed` | yes | Indicate that events should be streamed to external services (if configured) |
|
|
|
|
## Event streaming
|
|
|
|
All events where the entity is a `Group` or `Project` are recorded in the audit log, and also streamed to one or more
|
|
[event streaming destinations](../../administration/audit_event_streaming.md). When the entity is a:
|
|
|
|
- `Group`, events are streamed to the group's root ancestor's event streaming destinations.
|
|
- `Project`, events are streamed to the project's root ancestor's event streaming destinations.
|
|
|
|
You can add streaming-only events that are not stored in the GitLab database. This is primarily intended to be used for actions that generate
|
|
a large amount of data. See [this merge request](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/76719/diffs#d56e47632f0384722d411ed3ab5b15e947bd2265_26_36)
|
|
for an example.
|
|
This feature is under heavy development. Follow the [parent epic](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/5925) for updates on feature
|
|
development.
|
|
|
|
### I18N and the Audit Event `:message` attribute
|
|
|
|
We intentionally do not translate audit event messages because translated messages would be saved in the database and served to users, regardless of their locale settings.
|
|
|
|
This could mean, for example, that we use the locale for the currently logged in user to record an audit event message and stream the message to an external streaming
|
|
destination in the wrong language for that destination. Users could find that confusing.
|